this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
250 points (96.3% liked)

Games

16812 readers
294 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
250
Star Citizen Pushes Through the $700 Million Raised Mark and No, There Still Isn’t a Release Date (www.ign.com)
submitted 6 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 79 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It's really simple. They realized they could make more money by never releasing it. That realization has made them more money than the vast majority of game studios. It's a glorified ship showcase simulator, that's about it, not really a game. If they set a release date they'd reduce the amount of money they make, why would they do that?

[–] forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Feels very similar to the trend of 'why QA our AAA game before release when we can call it GaaS?'

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

Do you think they could finish the game if they wanted to?

[–] ZwoofBlaf@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I really don't think it's a conscious choice. Just Chris Roberts' typical perfectionism and nobody there to say "Ok, this is enough, we must ship something".

Having said that, I used to think Elite Dangerous had the superior model, but they've proven me wrong by going to absolute shit with Odyssey (no VR support, no walkable ships) and pretty much dropped all development thereafter.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 5 points 5 months ago

Nah, this non-release actually gives them a lot of money, and they simply have no incentive to stop anyone who thinks it's not ready.