223
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 133 points 2 years ago

Can she like... stop being a public figure?

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago

I wish. She gave us Trump. Irony.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The DNC screwing Bernie and voter abstention gave us Trump.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago

Bill Clinton encouraged Donald Trump to run for President during a phone call before he decided to run for president

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/politics/clinton-encouraged-trump-to-run-for-president_washington-dc/100233/

How the Hillary Clinton campaign deliberately "elevated" Donald Trump with its "pied piper" strategy

https://www.salon.com/2016/11/09/the-hillary-clinton-campaign-intentionally-created-donald-trump-with-its-pied-piper-strategy/

They Always Wanted Trump. Inside Team Clinton’s year-long struggle to find a strategy against the opponent they were most eager to face.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-2016-donald-trump-214428/

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

The Clinton's gave us Trump, no one else

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It’s easier to point fingers at her, but it’s not her job to keep the primary impartial. As I said above, it’s a candidate’s job to self advocate. It’s the DNC’s job to keep the primary fair and impartial.

Hillary was a disappointment. Debbie was a failure.

I’m guessing you’re blaming her while having abstained from voting in 2016?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Hillary was a disappointment. Debbie was a failure.

Debbie was a resounding success. She did the only thing she was there to do.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Not according to her job description.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Her duties didn't change one bit when she left the DNC to work for the Clinton campaign.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

So we agree that she was corrupt. Great. We’re done.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

She typifies party leadership to this day.

[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

it would've been a completely alternative universe if we had Bernie from 2016 until 2024. He's too good for rotten america

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

The silver lining of missing out on 8 years of President Sanders is 10+ years of Senator Sanders.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, you purity testing fuckers would currently be calling him names because he dared to compromise with people who only believe 99.95% of what you do.

Losing was the best thing to happen to Bernie. Now you can sanctify him because he's not in the limelight.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

The DNC screwing Bernie

In order to help whom?

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Again, it’s well documented that Debbie was helping Hillary. It’s not Hillary’s job to be impartial, it’s Debbie’s. There’s a reason insurance companies won’t pay the claim if you’re robbed after leaving your doors unlocked. Candidates are expected to ask for preferential treatment. It’s the convention’s job to deny it. This was Debbie’s responsibility, and she failed to execute.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

This was Debbie’s responsibility, and she failed to execute.

Her responsibility was to throw the primary for Clinton. She did so.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

You fuckers gave us Trump, and might give us Trump again.

this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
223 points (81.9% liked)

politics

31167 readers
2098 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS