this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
88 points (96.8% liked)

World News

38847 readers
2434 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rays of sunlight slice through pools of crystal water as clusters of fish cast shadows on the limestone below. Arching over the emerald basin are walls of stalactites dripping down the cavern ceiling, which opens to a dense jungle.

These glowing sinkhole lakes — known as cenotes — are a part of one of Mexico’s natural wonders: A fragile system of an estimated 10,000 subterranean caverns, rivers and lakes that wind almost surreptitiously beneath Mexico’s southern Yucatan peninsula.

Now, construction of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s crown jewel project — the Maya Train — is rapidly destroying part of that hidden underground world, already under threat by development and mass tourism. As the caverns are thrust into the spotlight in the lead-up to the country’s presidential elections, scientists and environmentalists warn that the train will mean long-term environmental ruin.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because it will destroy the natural environment.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But will it destroy the environment more than the status quo of driving and flying everywhere? I mean probably there are fewer such trips in Mexico than in richer countries but still quite a few.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yes. The roads are already built. While a train would take cars off the roads, the destruction is primarily caused by the construction, not ongoing use.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The roads are not the issue. The cars are the issue.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, obviously burning fossil fuels contributes to climate change, but the construction has a more direct and immediate impact on the local environment.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Climate change has a bigger long-term effect. The local environment will be destroyed anyway if we keep burning fossil fuels.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's not a good reason to cause extra destruction right now. We should not clear-cut the rainforest and fill cenotes with cement and stop burning fossil fuels.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Like I said, they're not doing it the way they should be doing it.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 4 months ago

Roads are much more easily used for illegal logging, hunting, etc. than train lines. Not sure if that’s an issue in Mexico but it for sure is elsewhere.