Technology

59549 readers

3560 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1064

Google Chrome’s plan to limit ad blocking extensions kicks off next week (arstechnica.com)

submitted 5 months ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

359 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Reminder to switch browsers if you haven't already!

Google Chrome is starting to phase out older, more capable ad blocking extensions in favor of the more limited Manifest V3 system.
The Manifest V3 system has been criticized by groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation for restricting the capabilities of web extensions.
Google has made concessions to Manifest V3, but limitations on content filtering remain a source of skepticism and concern.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HarriPotero@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You sweet summer child.

How long do you think Chrome will let DoH be opt-in?

[–] AlphaAutist@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (5 children)

You sweet summer child

How are they going to get past my firewall rules?

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 5 months ago

Nerd fight! Nerd fight! Nerd fight! Show 'em your bionicles collection!

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 18 points 5 months ago

By using the same hostnames that you need for wanted content.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

By refusing to load

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

[–] HarriPotero@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Personally, I'd like to see them force in-browser DoH down my throat with my computer powered off. They'll never see it coming.

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's not up to Chrome.

[–] HarriPotero@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The day they do their own DoH in-browser it is definitely up to them. It's already opt-in if you want to see how well your pi-hole won't work with it enabled.

Next step is to do DoH by default, and finally making it compulsory.

[–] Spotlight7573@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Chrome already does have DoH enabled by default from what I can tell.

https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/10468685

By default, Secure DNS in Chrome is turned on in automatic mode. If Chrome has issues looking up a site in this mode, it'll look up the site in the unencrypted mode.

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They can do it all they want but it won't work...

If I "opt in" it falls back to non doh immediately because using doh on my network is not up to Chrome.

use-application-dns.net + nxdomain for any known doh provider

I don't use pihole but doh blocking works great on my network. It should work on a pihole tho it's pretty basic stuff.

If you can't resolve the domain you can't validate the TLS certificate.