this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
398 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

58801 readers
4533 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 49 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So? If your invention depends on illegal plagiarism to exist, maybe it shouldn't. It's not the law's fault that LLMs depend on other people's work to function, nor was that its specific target when it was written

[–] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If your invention depends on illegal plagiarism to exist

Have any of the trials finished? I knew there were some ongoing but hadn't heard any rulings yet.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

The comment I was replying to basically said it has to be noncompliant (illegal) for the whole thing to work, as if that justified it. If a trial or whatever finds it's not illegal, so be it, but I'd still have some moral issues about basically everything anyone ever does or has done turning into AI food