this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
502 points (97.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43952 readers
676 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why not just let them host it?

[–] tool@r.rosettast0ned.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because we have some contracts that stipulate any data related to the project, including secrets/credentials, must remain on-site, and in some cases, on an air-gapped network. Doesn't make sense to spin up something else to manage those secrets when Bitwarden can do it all and satisfy the requirements of those contracts.

[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ahh figured it'd be something like that.

[–] MucherBucher@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty uncommon to host company credentials via 3rd party as policy. It wouldn't even be legal under national law for my field of work for example.

[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Obviously situations are different but the majority of standard businesses will let bitwarden host. In fact, I'd put more trust in bitwarden than than most self hosting teams.