this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
405 points (95.7% liked)

Television

4614 readers
20 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] g_the_b@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If they could commit to just five seasons it could be a really good show, but if they plan to try to keep it going and milk it, it'll be complete garbage by season 3

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It really depends. If they go more of an anthology route it will be easier to not tank it. (Not saying they wouldn't still manage to.)

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Anthology is better for longevity, but I could see a lot of people being turned off by introducing all new characters every season.

[–] tea@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's how the games are though. The different Fallout games exist in The same universe, but don't involve the same characters every time. I'd love it to be a combo, do 2 or 3 seasons of this set of characters. Tell their story. Then do Fallout: Alaska or whatever, a completely separate series, with a tie-in or two.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Each time the games introduce a bunch of characters, you get to spend 40-100+ hours with them before they move on.