289

The bodies of 109 Palestinians including 23 children and 11 women were taken to Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital, and spokesperson Khalil Degran told the Associated Press that more than 100 wounded also arrived to the hospital. In addition, he said the rest of the 210 Palestinians killed were taken to Al-Awda Hospital after the spokesman said he spoke to the director there. But the numbers at that hospital could not be confirmed by the AP. 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to continue the war until all hostages are freed, but Bassem Naim, a senior Hamas official now based in Lebanon, struck a drastically different tone. 

“The horrific massacre committed today by Netanyahu and his fascist government against the Palestinian people in Gaza, which led to slaughter of 210 and more than 400 wounded so far — under the pretext of liberating those detained by the resistance — confirms what the resistance has said repeatedly: that Netanyahu doesn’t plan to reach an agreement to stop the war and free the captured Israelis peacefully,” Naim said, according to the Associated Press.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago

Amazing how reportedly 0 combatants were killed while this rescue happened.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

At least one IDF soldier was killed.

The Hamas dead isn't counted separately from the civilians. Never have been. The casualty numbers you see reported is always civilians + Hamas.

Hamas doesn't wear uniforms, so it's difficult for a third party to make an assessment on how many combatants have been killed in this war. Also there's a war happening, so that makes things difficult even when the combatants are all wearing uniforms.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Don't check the serial numbers on the weapons tho 👉👈

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

They have weapons stashed all over the place so they can blend in with the civilian population when changing positions. Which is why they don't wear uniforms.

Smart strategy... if you don't have any concern for the lives of civilians. Which Hamas doesn't.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

No it's a great strategy either way we just generally assume the other side isn't jumping with glee to murder indiscriminately.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

Yes Hamas wants the IDF to kill indiscriminately. It's why they don't wear uniforms. That's the whole point of how they operate.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

You're missing the point. The general idea is that an modern organized army would not fire into civilians, you know morality being a thing and all. The IDF doing it anyway proves Hamas point, they're not seen as people by the Israeli government anymore. You wouldn't fire indiscriminately into a crowd a sheep to kill the wolf, why would you do the same with people.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago

The point you're missing is that the tactics of Hamas has resulted in the IDF not being able to distinguish civilians from combatants. There's a reason why non-uniformed combatants are considered differently (they're basically just criminals) under international law than uniformed combatants. Because everyone knows when wars are fought by combatants who don't wear uniforms, there's a massive increase in civilian casualties.

You're a 19 year old in a truck and someone is running towards you as fast as they can. You have seconds to determine whether that person is a civilian desperate to get food, or a combatant that's running towards you to kill you. Both the civilians and the combatants are dressed in the exact same style of clothing. You're scared and have seconds to make a decision that will either end someone else's life or end your own life. What happens next?

You can't understand why it's criminal for combatants to not wear uniforms? If Hamas cared about their people they'd be wearing uniforms. But Hamas has successfully monetized the deaths of Palestinian civilians which is why they do what they do.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I haven't missed it at all. Duh. That's still not an excuse to kill in crowds.

That's not what's happening here and you know it.

You know the IDF has plain clothes units right? You know who's made more? Israel, you know who historically has paid Hamas, Israel. Who stands to gain the most, Israel.

Fun question, is Hamas killing civilians in countries they're not actively at war in? No? So that's just Israel increasing border tensions then.. mmm

Cut the shit bud, you know your argument is shitty and immoral..

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

so the children were killed because..?

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Because Hamas cowards deliberately fire at an enemy army for locations where there are children.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
289 points (94.7% liked)

News

39046 readers
1977 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS