this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
297 points (88.2% liked)

Men's Liberation

1865 readers
1 users here now

This community is first and foremost a feminist community for men and masc people, but it is also a place to talk about men’s issues with a particular focus on intersectionality.


Rules

Everybody is welcome, but this is primarily a space for men and masc people


Non-masculine perspectives are incredibly important in making sure that the lived experiences of others are present in discussions on masculinity, but please remember that this is a space to discuss issues pertaining to men and masc individuals. Be kind, open-minded, and take care that you aren't talking over men expressing their own lived experiences.



Be productive


Be proactive in forming a productive discussion. Constructive criticism of our community is fine, but if you mainly criticize feminism or other people's efforts to solve gender issues, your post/comment will be removed.

Keep the following guidelines in mind when posting:

  • Build upon the OP
  • Discuss concepts rather than semantics
  • No low effort comments
  • No personal attacks


Assume good faith


Do not call other submitters' personal experiences into question.



No bigotry


Slurs, hate speech, and negative stereotyping towards marginalized groups will not be tolerated.



No brigading


Do not participate if you have been linked to this discussion from elsewhere. Similarly, links to elsewhere on the threadiverse must promote constructive discussion of men’s issues.



Recommended Reading

Related Communities

!feminism@beehaw.org
!askmen@lemmy.world
!mensmentalhealth@lemmy.world


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago (4 children)

This was originally a reply to a comment but I thought it’s important enough to reply to the post too:

The issue isn’t masculinity or how it can be toxic (to even suggest it is insulting imo).

The issue is:

Society does not value men!!!

That’s it, it’s not complicated at all. It’s not this weird problem with masculinity.

Society does not value men inherently like women (as in for just existing), it values the benefit they can provide.

This has been the case in all of human history. The difference now is that we no longer prepare most/all men to be able to provide the most value they can.

I always thought the solution was to value men inherently too. But that means saying a “you go bro” to incels and other “low value” men.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The best way I've heard it put is that society values women for what they are, and values men for what they do. This is bad for everyone, of course, but it's how things have worked.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

That’s a good way to put it.

It’s also what I meant by women being valued inherently.

It’s like conditional love vs unconditional love, they are VERY different.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m not sure I agree with that. Society values women for all the wrong reasons (sexual objects, something to be controlled, etc). Men are valued for the wrong reasons too (physical prowess, etc).

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago

Well I’m not claiming that women are or are not valued for the wrong reasons, just that they are not mainly valued for the benefits they provide but men are.

I’m saying men being valued for the benefit they provide without support is why there is a lot of mental health issues today. And that what people call “toxic masculinity” is basically caused by this expectation that society puts on men.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Society does not value men inherently like women (as in for just existing), it values the benefit they can provide.

Since when have we inherently valued women? Since they received the right to vote, maybe when they were allowed to have credit cards without a man's permission?

How exactly are we defining value here? I just don't see any appreciation of value being shown that isn't directly related to maintaining a hierarchy of relations based on what's between your legs and what you do with it.

If society inherently valued women I would think they would have more to show for it.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Value women as in having more women’s shelters, having more support systems for women. Or even things like more scholarships for women.

Usually men have to provide value to get support.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

But those are direct reactions to women lacking opportunities in those specific fields.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago

Society doesn't value people. This applies close to equally for all cis people at least. If you look at the statistics of who makes money (which is normally attributed to value), it values men a little more. (Modern capitalist) society stomps over all individuals though. The individual does not matter except for the wealth that can be extracted from them.

I always thought the solution was to value men inherently too. But that means saying a “you go bro” to incels and other “low value” men.

This makes me think you're not talking about society valuing women, and instead the value women put on their friends (in movies and other media, which isn't always how it works). If your friends put you down instead of lifting you up, that's an issue with your friends, not society. I know my (male) friends (mostly male) generally lift me up. This is an issue you can solve. Either dump your bad friends or encourage the behavior you want to see out of them be doing it yourself.