this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
485 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2193 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I used to mainly vote third party as a protest vote for both sides to do better. Didn't matter the party, really.

I voted for Obama out of genuinely wanting him in office. I thought he was decent overall but he did disappoint me.

I voted for Biden purely to keep Trump out of office. Even so, I think Biden has largely been a better President than Obama was, though the Gaza/Israel thing is really testing that. I would love to have a more progressive choice, but any time I am disappointed in Biden, I just remind myself the alternative and I would crawl across a mile of broken glass to vote for him.

So I would anecdotally say this election is outside the norm.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

So I would anecdotally say this election is outside the norm.

If you mean "unique in 240 years of American history" I agree.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So I would anecdotally say this election is outside the norm.

as will be the next, and the one after that, as well as all of the ones following; meanwhile you'll continue crawling over broken glass and giving a pass to ongoing genocides because you believe it's better than the alternative somehow without realizing there's one alternative.

no one knows the right answer, but there are plenty of wrong answers and 2 of those have been placed before and you're told that you must select one.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Told? It's just math. If you want to change things, you have to either do it from within an existing party or wait for an existing party to implode and then maybe there is an opportunity for change.

I'm fifty. I spent a lot of fucking elections wasting my vote on third parties, thinking I was sending some kind of message or making things better, but here we are. I wasted every single vote prior to 2008. Would anything be different if I hadn't? No. Would anything be different if a bunch of people hadn't? I don't know. Maybe.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

as i said before: no one knows the right answer, but there are plenty of wrong answers, we know they're wrong because we've tried them and things don't get better (and we sometimes try it again with the same results); we're only allowed to pick from among those wrong answers only.

trying anything otherwise might also be a wrong answer; but we will never know because there are plenty who will shame you if don't pick the same wrong answer they do.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Fair. Government is hard. There is no such thing as a right answer. Just shit that we find out later didn't work. I'm not happy with either of the two parties; I don't really believe in parties anyway. But here we are.

Fight the good fight, my friend, but just don't let fascism take us. My grandfather fought against the fascists in WW2, and here I am doing the same (though admittedly with way less personal risk) 80 years later. I don't like it, but it is what it is.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So I would anecdotally say this election is outside the norm.

I worry that it's the new baseline.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

New baseline?! I have often gotten the feeling that you are an adolescent. It would explain so many of the shitty hot takes and bad ideas. But this really kind of solidifies it. Being young is not an insult however. We all were at one point in time. And we all matured and grew up.

This is so not a new thing though. Trump is literally Reagan part 2. And that's just within the last 50 years that's not even mentioning Nixon or all the others that came before him. The truth is this is been the way it has always been. It sucks that so much of the energy of youth is wasted tilting at windmills. Instead of actually understanding and working to improve things. Actively demotivating non Republican voters in an effort to get the Republican candidate to win. That sounds like a real good way to improve things.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

As someone who lived through the Reagan administrations, Trump is far, far worse than Reagan part 2.

Granted there are similarities such as Reagan ignoring AIDS and Trump ignoring Covid, but at the same time, Reagan was far more likeable while committing actual war crimes in the Iran/Contra affair, and having the CIA dealing cocaine.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_involvement_in_Contra_cocaine_trafficking