this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
261 points (86.6% liked)

People Twitter

5277 readers
351 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yup, mail voting every time, with dropoff locations everywhere. There's a paper trail, so recounts can be done if we suspect issues.

I'm not worrried about voting machine fraud, I just don't see the point.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 5 months ago

came to say that mail in voting was the most secure method.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm worried about voting machine fraud when there is no paper trail, since that is how Kemp stole an election and got away with it.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

From what I can tell, Kemp didn't steal the election (btw, that's a left-leaning news source according to this site). If anything, it encouraged more Democrats to get out and vote, not less.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I was thinking of the wrong election. When the state gets sued over votes and those votes just so happen to be erased, that is suspicious af. But that wasn't 2018. Kemp wasn't running in the election where GA wiped the hard disks, but he was in charge at the time.

The 2018 election where he was able to remove voters from the registry and close poll sites is just standard conflict-of-interest, I suppose.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Or in a non-conspiratorial vein, it's literally his job to remove obsolete voters from the registry and ensure there are enough (and not too many) polls to keep costs in line.

I don't know anything about that guy to know if he's acting in good faith or not. I don't live in Georgia, and I've only been there for a couple days ever in my life. Maybe he's a corrupt pile of crap, or maybe he was just doing his job. The news on this is crazy slanted, but it seems like he was at least acting within the law.