132

OpenAI's Mira Murati: "some creative jobs maybe will go away, but maybe they shouldn't have been there in the first place" (mastodon.social)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by s08nlql9@lemm.ee to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

OpenAI's Mira Murati: "some creative jobs maybe will go away, but maybe they shouldn't have been there in the first place" And you stole everything from creative people who provided free texts, images, forum answers, etc. To date, your company has refused to acknowledge any credit. Rich people truly live in their bubble and have zero sympathy for fellow human or their livelihood.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 years ago

Think of the first transition to data-driven businesses or the gig economy.

Just a clarification: the "gig economy" was not "new" in any way, just using new technology to skirt around labor laws and find loopholes in regulations in order to claw back profits that had been "lost" to things like pensions and health coverage.

[-] MudMan@fedia.io 2 points 2 years ago

Well, yeah, that's what I'm talking about here, specifically. There was an application of technology that bypassed regulations put in place to manage a previous iteration of that technology and there was a period of lawlessness that then needed new regulation. The solutions were different in different places. Some banned the practice, some equated it with employees, some with contractors, some made custom legislation.

But ultimately the new framework needed regulation just like the old framework did. The fiction that the old version was inherently more protected is an illusion created by the fact that we were born after common sense guardrails were built for that version of things.

AI is the same. It changes some things, we're gonna need new tools to deal with the things it changes. Not because it's worse, but because it's the same thing in a new wrapper.

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago

Thank you for clarifying. Definitely agree on this. Especially with regards to the perceived guardrails.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024

132 points (95.2% liked)

Fuck AI

8710 readers

1899 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

Rules:

Relevant posts only.
No bigotry.
No misinformation.
No NSFW/NSFL content without being labeled NSFW or being in an appropriately-labeled spoiler tag.
This isn't a place to talk about the cons and (supposed) pros of AI for different use cases. This is /c/fuck_ai .
Especially no AI advocacy.
No AI-generated content. If you want to post examples of AI failing hillariously, there are other communities for that like !ArtificialIgnorance@lemmy.ca .
Venting is part of the purpose of this community, but don't aim frustration or accusations at other users.
These rules are a living document that may change in the future.

You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.

Effective reports: