132

OpenAI's Mira Murati: "some creative jobs maybe will go away, but maybe they shouldn't have been there in the first place" (mastodon.social)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by s08nlql9@lemm.ee to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

OpenAI's Mira Murati: "some creative jobs maybe will go away, but maybe they shouldn't have been there in the first place" And you stole everything from creative people who provided free texts, images, forum answers, etc. To date, your company has refused to acknowledge any credit. Rich people truly live in their bubble and have zero sympathy for fellow human or their livelihood.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

That’s why you need strong safety nets to help people transition to new industries or at least to give them a dignified retirement out of the workforce. That’s neither here nor there, if it’s not AI it’ll be the next thing.

I agree with most of what you wrote in this paragraph, but we have no such strong safety nets. I don't think the fact that it has happened previously is justification for creating those circumstances again now (or in the future) without concern for how it impacts people. We're supposed to be getting better as time goes by. (not that we are by many other metrics I can see on a daily basis, but as you say that's another conversation)

Genies don’t get put back in bottles, you just learn to regulate and manage the world they leave behind when they come out. And, if you catch it soon enough, maybe you get to it in time to ask for one wish that isn’t just some rich guy’s wet dream.

I also agree with this.

But, I find there is plenty of justification to push back and try to slow the proliferation of AI in certain areas while our laws and morality try to catch up.

[-] MudMan@fedia.io 2 points 2 years ago

Your "we" and my "we" are probably not the same, I'm afraid. I'm not shocked that the difference in context would result in a difference of perception, but I'd argue that you guys would need an overhaul on the regulations and safety nets thing regardless.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Fair point, this ol' nation needs a new set of spark plugs and a valve job, at a minimum. :)

Edit: DAMMIT how am I a moderator again @VerbFlow@lemmy.world? Removing myself again now.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024

132 points (95.2% liked)

Fuck AI

8710 readers

1627 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

Rules:

Relevant posts only.
No bigotry.
No misinformation.
No NSFW/NSFL content without being labeled NSFW or being in an appropriately-labeled spoiler tag.
This isn't a place to talk about the cons and (supposed) pros of AI for different use cases. This is /c/fuck_ai .
Especially no AI advocacy.
No AI-generated content. If you want to post examples of AI failing hillariously, there are other communities for that like !ArtificialIgnorance@lemmy.ca .
Venting is part of the purpose of this community, but don't aim frustration or accusations at other users.
These rules are a living document that may change in the future.

You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.

Effective reports: