this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
1438 points (97.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26922 readers
3175 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 125 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

If I'm remembering right, wasn't this specifically developed to assist in helping to better identify victims of human trafficking?

Yep. Found it.

https://www.romper.com/p/a-man-made-app-that-shows-women-without-makeup-on-there-is-so-much-to-unpack-here-5480392

[–] Lyre@lemmy.ca 66 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Boy that would seriously mess with the narrative of this comment section if that were the case

Edit: oh no

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's been used by people for nefarious purposes, regardless of its original intent. Both perspectives are valid.

edit: sexist horseshit is not a valid perspective.

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

What sexist horseshit are you talking about?

[–] unipadfox@pawb.social 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Of course the creator is going to tout the most morally upstanding use of his app. If it genuinely helps human trafficking victims, then that's another story, but from this quote it just seems like he has some vague hope about it.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 37 points 5 months ago

A tech startup with vague likely unrealistic hopes? What are the chances?

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that sounds so much like post-hoc justification that I'm seriously surprised that it's being swallowed by anyone.

I mean, great if it DOES help with such a terrible problem, it's just I have seen this thing being talked about before and it's NEVER been discussed in terms of helping trafficking victims. This is the first I've heard of it. Almost every time you see this kind of narrative being discussed it's either 99% of the time a bunch of sweaty incels online whinging about how women aren't really pretty and just want to trap guys or some other dom/sub kink fantasy nonsense to validate their depression and self-loathing, OR about 1% of the time it's an actual empowering discussion talking about unfair hollywood beauty standards.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean ageing technology (what the person might look like after 5 years etc) was also created for human trafficking victims, and I haven't seen it really being talked about in many years now since it came out. Seems weird to base something on whether or not you've heard of it.

If the family doesn't have a recent picture of the person without makeup, then yeah, this would be useful, since people can look pretty different without makeup. I'm the only one who has recent pictures of my wife without makeup for example, her friends and parents only have pictures of her with makeup since she normally does some when meeting them. She's also half Chinese, so depending on how she decides to do her make up, can look way more asian or barely asian at all. If I didn't have those pictures and something happened, the make-up pictures wouldn't be as useful in searching for her.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I think this is more about whether or not the creator was honest when they claim that's why they created the app and it looks like many people here, myself included, are dubious about that being his intention and not just a justification.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

wasn't this specifically developed to assist in helping to better identify victims of human trafficking?

The author of the article you linked doesn't seem to believe that.

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 months ago

The creator stated their intent, and the author disagreed. Does that opinion make the creator's statement untrue?

It's a weird situation & definitely a slippery slope. Was it his intent? I honestly can't say. I guess it's certainly a possibility.

I don't think this kind of app is harmful in itself. This kind of thing can & will obviously be used/weapon used by stupid shit-heads for their own agenda, but those kind of people will utilize literally anything that exists to justify their shit-head views.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

The author of the article is right not to believe this claim. The author can say that their software was intended for whatever noble uses they want. We know from experience that software has mainstream off-label use.

Is BitTorrent really a tool for downloading community content like open films and Linux distros? Because that's what the creators say it's for. It's not untrue.

Is Jellyfin or Plex a tool for organizing your ripped collection of CDs, DVDs, and Blu-rays? That's what the developers say. It's not untrue

Is Tor a tool for protecting dissidents? That's what they say it is. It really is that. But is that all it is?

This tool might be useful for identifying sex trafficking victims, just as a nudifying app might be useful for identifying victims of involuntary pornography.

But on the other side of this is that nudifying apps are more likely to be used to create involuntary pornography, and makeup-removal apps are more likely to be used to harass women.

No reason to ban AI technology or anything, but no reason to pretend that tools like this aren't used for off-label and sometimes nefarious purposes.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Notably unbiased person Internet McJournalist