The Middle Ages were not "a time of ignorance, barbarism and superstition"; the Church did not place religious authority over personal experience and rational activity;
Like hell it didn't.
and the term "Dark Ages" is rejected by modern historians
Because it's a prejudicial term, not because the past isn't fucking shitty.
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. See stickied post https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)
Like hell it didn't.
Because it's a prejudicial term, not because the past isn't fucking shitty.
If that were true then what do you call the classical age? The darker ages?
We generally say 'Antiquity' and 'Late Antiquity' anymore.
Ooh present-tense anymore! Really don't see that very often, but it's got a nice ring to it
Edit: it's a positive anymore not present-tense. Thank you @oktux@lemm.ee!
Can you explain please ? I don't understand their sentence as it is
It sounds odd to me too, but I found a wiki article on it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_anymore
Thanks, TIL I learned