172
submitted 2 years ago by mathic@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

He'd get my vote....

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 years ago

If we're going with a comedian, I'd sooner pick Jon Stewart. That is assuming he'd even want to do it.

[-] jeeva@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

For what it's worth, as it's not clear if you're already aware, but Al Franken was actually a pretty decent senator for ~9 years.

Jon has stuck his oar into political matters, but not at that level.

[-] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah and Al was good at it too before he got sac'ed for a dumb gag photo!

Jon is probably a bit more eloquent and has an impeccable moral compass. I've got a good feeling he's smart enough to know he doesn't know shit about most things but would during himself with people that do and would listen to them on those matters.

Also, he doesn't want to do it which makes me think he'd actually be good at it. He'd recognize it as a mostly shit job that needs to be done well and not as some sort of self-aggrandizing accomplishment after decades in politics. Something about true leaders not seeking power but having it thrust upon them I guess :>

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

Jon / Al ticket would be amazing they are both smarter and kinder than any politican out there.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Bernie and AOC are very good too. There are probably others, USA has a lot of politicians. It's impossible to know but a fraction of them.

[-] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I like Bernie but we'd be running into the same cryptkeeper problems before long too.

AOC while I agree with her on most things doesn't really come off as particularly charismatic.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Love how you're being downvoted for pointing out that Bernie is older than either of the other 2 candidates

I think the downvotes are aimed at the AOC commentary, which I too disagree with.

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 1 points 2 years ago

She's also not old enough yet.

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Legally she is. 35yo as of October 13th.

[-] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Politics doest work by picking your heros though, you have to pick people others outside your narrow group will support.

AOC has a lot of work to do before she's getting a decent share of the national vote

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In that respect it makes it easy then that 95% of them stride on the party line with no conviction of their own and never waver from what daddy DNC tells them to do, making them generic, forgettable, and unimportant.

It is the exact same for the right except with more outliers that try to be blatantly worse human beings than the others.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Bernie is older than Biden, and AOC doesn't know anything about foreign policy.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Al/Jon would work better. I think Franken would do better in the Oval Office while Jon would shine cracking the whip as President of the Senate. Might be able to get some work out of those bastards for a change.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Jon Stewart tearing into the Senate on a daily basis for four years would heal my soul

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I like Jon too much to make him president. Trying to get health care for 9/11 first responders aged him a lot.

[-] hypnoton@discuss.online 3 points 2 years ago

Oh fuck yes. I pick Jon over Al any day, just as I'd pick the either over Biden.

[-] Artyom@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago

After 4 years of Trump, I'm done with celebrity politicians for the rest of my life.

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
172 points (82.6% liked)

politics

31197 readers
1589 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS