this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
1032 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59657 readers
2786 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
1032
USB-C hubs and my slow descent into madness - Dennis Schubert (overengineer.dev)
submitted 1 year ago by otter@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
201 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I was looking for a new USB-c hub and came across this article. It's an interesting write-up of what is on the inside of some popular options

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their Docks with dual display out for Mac either use two USB-C ports to the device or use DisplayLink, which is a whole other story. While it's true that the normal M1/M2 only support one external display, the Pro variants support two, and the Max variants up to four (which is impossible via a single cable though).

And that's alright, as (single) USB-C 3.x docks can't support two independent DisplayPort streams. Proper Thunderbolt 4 docks could very well though.

Also, docks for Mac or not, if it's USB, it's probably the same Realtek Ethernet chip the guy in the article linked by OP is talking about. And that has its own host of issues.

[โ€“] asap@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's very interesting. I have been contemplating switching to Mac recently, and it's a bit surprising to hear something that Windows can apparently do better. Thanks for the info.