this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
50 points (100.0% liked)
Formula 1
5562 readers
1 users here now
c/formula1
Welcome to c/formula1.
Rules
Please keep discussions civil, respect other's opinions, and keep it friendly. Please read our rules before posting in our community.
Rules TLDR
- No spoilers in post titles please. Use of spoiler tags is considered a courtesy for now.
- No piracy discussion.
- Keep it on topic.
- No memes.
Resources
These sites are a good place to start finding out about Formula 1, aside from right here of course!
Formula1.com - the official Formula 1 website.
Formula 1 Youtube - the official F1 youtube channel.
Liquipedia Overview - what's happening now and next in a nice dashboard.
F1Calendar.com - never miss a session again!
F1Countdown.com - for those of you who like countdowns!
Sister Communities
!Motorsports - for the love of racing outside of Formula 1.
!FormulaDank@Lemmy.world - because you love memes.
!simracing@lemmy.ml - let's race!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Agreed. I'm not against the change in and of itself, but I completely fail to see the "why" behind it.
Well Q1 could be interesting if the hards take too long to heat up or if they last long enough to set multiple fast laps without pitting.
Definitely an issue at Monaco. Not sure about other tracks.
Why? Because change justifies position. It doesn't matter that its not broke and there is no reason to change.
Engineers always like breaking things that only they can fix.
Source: Am an engineer.