76
submitted 2 years ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

I suspect this is comparing against default Wine without fsync or esync (which are included with Proton and some wine builds) but from memory, ntsync has better compatibility and some performance gains over fsync (the next fastest alternative). But don't expect 50% performance gains compared to fsync in most workloads.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago

Any bit of improvement is good in my book, though I agree that the title is a bit misleading.

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 2 years ago

Its indeed on average 50%.. in some games.. Sometimes only 5% while in other cases even 150%.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Yep, and most people are already using fsync anyways via proton/lutris/etc. so the gain is a bit misleading.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
76 points (94.2% liked)

Linux

14858 readers
1587 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS