this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
247 points (97.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43962 readers
1413 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When you connect a new device to a 'smart' tv, you must pay homage to the manufacturer with a ritualistic dance. Plugging and unplugging the device. Turning them on and off in the correct sequence like entering a konami code.

Every time you want to switch devices, the tv must scan for them. And god forbid you lose power, or unplug something. You are granted the delight experience of doing it all over again.

I have fond memories of the days of just plugging something in, and pressing the input button. Instant gratification. It was a simpler time.

What is some other tech that used to be better?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 59 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Much safer now though. Traffic accidents are much less lethal nowadays (except SUV/Truck vs ped)

[–] geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yeah but that isn't because of the LCD touchscreen console and software locked seat heating

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lane assist and being able to control shit via voice or steering wheel buttons absolutely has helped with safety though. While lane assist is not going to completely prevent you from serving off the road if you pass out, it will happen much less often. Of course you should not drive while tired but people still do pretty often. Being able to change a radio station or call someone from steering wheel buttons is a hell of a lot safer than fiddling with a radio dial or searching for a CD/cassette to play. A girl in my high school died doing that one.

Seat heating was not really a thing in anything but luxury models until pretty recently.

I do agree about replacing controls with a touchscreen though. Fuck that. That is absolutely less safe than having tactile feedback.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The problem you’ve addressed is that too many people should not be driving or doing what they’re doing while they’re driving. All these safety features are really just ‘I’m too distracted to pay attention to operating a motor vehicle’ features.

There absolutely is some technology that’s been beneficial. But the cat has been let out of the bag and people are losing the choice to safely operate a car on their own.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it turns out humans be humaning. We are not robots. You have the option to safely operate a car on your own but if you so happen to have an issue where you cannot operate one safely in the moment, the safety features help you out. You can still operate a vehicle with lane assist and not even notice that it is enabled. You also have the ability to turn it off. You can also still operate a vehicle with adaptive cruise control enabled and not even notice it if you are shaky operating the vehicle properly. These features do not prevent people from operating a vehicle safely on their own. They are there because a fuck ton of people cannot and never have been able to. The past driver mortality rate which was higher when these safety features were not an option is clear evidence of that.

Again, if you are indeed a robot and have never had an issue of going over the lines or going above the speed limit or ever checked your rear view mirror at an inopportune time when someone in front of you is slamming on their brakes, you can still operate a vehicle just the same as you would if they were not there. Hell, you can also simply disable them. But those safety features are there for the rest of us that recognize that shit happens.

Now I will certainly agree that many people should not be driving. I believe that you should have a hell of a lot more practice than six months of driver's education and passing a very simple test once to be able to drive for the rest of your life. I also recognize that driving is a requirement for many people to work. I welcome alternatives to driving but it is not a reality yet. The increase in safety features helps minimize death and injury in the current reality.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

operate a vehicle with lane assist and not even notice that it is enabled.

I see this as the problem. We're becoming more reliant on robots to accomplish basic tasks. If the mode of transportation is fully automated - fine. But that is not the case, yet. It's still the licensed driver's responsibility if there's a crash. You can't tell a judge your robot made a mistake.

You know how they say Gen Alpha doesn't know how to turn on a computer or use a file system? It's like that. We can't just give the robots full control of our lives. We should know the basics of operating a car, of being aware of our surroundings, of how to instinctively make a split second decision.

I'll offer a compromise. There should be two (or more) levels of operating licenses. If you want your car to do everything for you, you do not have the same permissions as someone who knows how to fully drive a car. This means you're unable to rent or borrow a car that requires your full attention. At least this creates some sort of stricter legal ramification when someone who's been dependent upon driver assist features for a decade and gets behind the wheel of a "dumb" car and kills someone because they don't know how to merge onto a highway. Frankly, we could benefit from this premise on existing drivers and vehicles today.

[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 points 4 months ago

Even the most reliable drivers overlook something, get distracted by something on the road or in the car. These features absolutely help more than they harm.

[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 4 months ago

Of course not, what makes you think anything i said is even vaguely related to those negative cherry picks?

Is car manufacturing and design not tech?

Do impact detection, brake assist/auto brake, modern lane assist, distance detection etc not add to safety? I could probably rattle on

[–] ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Over the past 5 years the monthly road deaths here in aus have been going up, because of the prevalence of those massive cars

[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah tbh there would be no harm in banning them. If you need a work truck, those are fine. No person in the world needs an SUV or an oversized pickup truck

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say "no person" but the F150 should not be the most sold vehicle for the last 10 years straight.

We need to shame Pavement Princesses and Suburban Assault Vehicles out of market dominance.

https://tyreextinguishers.com/

[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 points 4 months ago

Not sure who would ever need an SUV, especially in an urban env. Most of the common ones have zero off roading capabilities either, so work vehicles are usually specialised.

Thanks for the link though, I'll forward it :)

[–] FippleStone@aussie.zone 1 points 4 months ago

Those awful american "trucks" do my head in, always a certain type of dickhead driving them too...