this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
15 points (54.7% liked)

politics

19238 readers
2104 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 74 points 5 months ago (8 children)

I'm gonna be real, I've felt powerless my entire voting life. I've only been able to vote for the "lesser evil". I want real fucken cchoices that are real fucking people. Our system only serves us an endless stream of disconnected neoliberals and its fucken shit.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The issue isn't that Biden stands in the way, its that no one is actually building up a reasonable alternative.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. You need to actually have a real alternative to Biden that enough people can agree with. Kamala, Newcom, Buttigieg seem to be losing out in early discussions and they're the best chance to an alternative. Find someone, hype them up and seriously push them as an alternative.

I'm not against Biden, but I'm not necessarily against change either. I'm also not a Democrat, but I want to see a reasonable candidate to vote for as much as anyone else. But unless you can prove to me that the next person to step up is someone reasonable (if someone spends like 15 posts pushing lol Bernie Sanders at me like last time this topic was brought up... so help me... an even older man who disagrees with my politics is the last one I'd be voting for)

Pick someone, push them forward. Good luck. If you can't do that, I'm holding my support for Biden because yall fools don't have anyone else. If you can do that (and if I agree with your choice), then and only then can we move forward.


The idea that you want Biden to step out before a reasonable alternative is lined up is fucking insane. Start hyping people today, no need for Biden to step aside as you try to build up support to someone else.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Hell, if there was a viable candidate who actually wanted to be the Democratic nominee they could've run just like Dean Phillips and Mariann Williamson did. Biden/Democratic leadership didn't prevent anyone from running against Biden. I would've been happy to see Witmer, Newsome, Shapiro, etc announce their candidacy a year ago, but they made the decision not to do so. That hasn't changed. If someone changes their mind I'm all ears, but until then I'm not going to help conservatives by calling for Biden to step down.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Whitmer would be good if she wanted to step up. The main issue with Governors is that they are busy governing.

It shouldn't be too hard to get a back-room deal between Whitmer or Shapiro to coordinate an announcement with Biden though. But what they'd need is public support before they start that push.

Make it real obvious that we'd vote for Whitmer or Shapiro (both look serious and Id vote for them over Biden and Trump). And we can start there. Let the elites figure out things afterwards.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And we also need clarification on who the hell can access Biden's campaign funds if he does step aside. Ive seen some pundits claim that only Harris can access that money, if that's true I kind of think we're done looking. It would have to be her, even if she isn't the best option. I'm not a campaign finance expert though.

And I think Witmer would landslide if she was the nominee. She's really well spoken, has done some great shit in Michigan, has full control of her bowel movements probably, and having a woman at the top of the ticket when women's healthcare is such a hot issue is a recipe for success.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

And I think Witmer would landslide if she was the nominee. She’s really well spoken, has done some great shit in Michigan, has full control of her bowel movements probably, and having a woman at the top of the ticket when women’s healthcare is such a hot issue is a recipe for success.

Every candidate loses 20 IQ when they enter the national stage and have to dumb down their political message to match a larger audience.

Its a difficult thing to do. Running on the national stage is very different than running locally. Ideally we'd have seen how any of these candidates do a year or two ago, but there's not enough time for that anymore.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's pretty much always the giant douche vs. the turd sandwich

Though this one is more the giant douche vs. the-turd-sandwich-who's-fronting-for-fascists-bent-on-destroying-democracy.

Stll though...

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Sometimes south park is so stupid, and sometimes its utterly brilliant.

Mostly it's both I guess.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

That's because most Americans, especially in the Democratic Party, are disconnected neoliberals.

The system is working as designed, to produce the candidate that the most voters agree on.

We just don't agree with most voters. And since there's more of them than us, nobody needs to care what we think.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

And donald trump.

This is how he's winning. He's the "rebel" candidate (and yes I know that is tremendously ironic for so many reasons).

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How much do you wanna bet that the Democrats force Clinton as the next presidential candidate? Because age doesn't mean a thing to them apparently.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

It worked before. Right?