this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
241 points (91.4% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2043 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 41 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The potential for backfire is massive. Of course in our timeline, Trump gets grazed in the ear. Stop teasing us.

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I would honestly say the odds it was a failed genuine assassination attempt are slim to none. Doesn’t this feel far too convenient? We obviously know nothing now, but I feel like it’s gotta be the knee jerk assumption.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I agree. I wouldn't be surprised if this was all a ploy for attention so he can look tough, and rile up his base. That is completely on brand.

Edit: Unfortunately, it appears to be a completely genuine, yet failed, assassination attempt...

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What the fuck are you two smoking?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 4 months ago

Republicans love crying false flag. You should know by now they also love projection.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Nothing. I'm just examining the situation, and asking who benefits.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Trump is a known coward. If he didn't know this was coming he'd have shit his pants and run offstage. His reaction is entirely unrealistic to the situation and how he is known to act.

For fucks sake he asked for his shoes and waited around for them before leaving the stage. Those are not the actions of a man who is being actively shot at.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

We have prior footage of him dippin', dodgin' and duckin' at rallies from noises. You're right the reaction seems off. But he could be delirious due to his aged mental acuity.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trump is a known coward. If he didn’t know this was coming he’d have shit his pants and run offstage. His reaction is entirely unrealistic to the situation and how he is known to act.

spoken like someone who has never been shot before...

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's not about how I'd react, it's about how he reacts.

yeah, and that's about what i would expect someone to do when getting shot. The adrenaline and people surrounding you can make you do weird things.

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago

I don’t see why Trump would really need to be in on it. Plenty of people stand to gain from a trump presidency, and I’m not sure an “accidentally successful staged assassination” would be that much worse.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

This is the absolute most insane take on this. Everything in the world isn't some grand orchestrated plan.