this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
495 points (87.3% liked)

Privacy

32169 readers
333 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vhstape@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Literally every browser has this option, and it gives users a choice. If you use an ad blocker, it has this option as well and has had it for several years now.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago

Not this option, but generally I agree. Currently I don't think this is bad, and in the longer term we will see if this leaks any identifyable data.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is the first browset to implement something like that. I don't know what you're talking about and you don't either apparently.

[–] vhstape@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Safari refers to it as "Privacy-Preserving Ad Measurement", and Chrome includes an option as part of its "Privacy Sandbox." Please have the decency to do a basic google search before being an asshole :)

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 4 months ago

Chrome's privacy sandbox is a very different protocol from Mozilla's PPA protocol. I haven't read about Safari's variant so I don't know if that's a copy/paste of Chrome's or it's own protocol

The big difference between Privacy Sandbox (previously Topics API and before that FLoC) and PPA is that Google's "solution" still tracks the user while Mozilla's just tracks the ads and gives aggregate data to the advertiser