Politics

281 readers

64 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

Jack Smith to appeal Cannon's dismissal of classified documents case (www.msnbc.com)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Here’s what the special counsel’s office said Monday:

The dismissal of the case deviates from the uniform conclusion of all previous courts to have considered the issue that the Attorney General is statutorily authorized to appoint a Special Counsel. The Justice Department has authorized the Special Counsel to appeal the court’s order.

The first part of the statement highlights how out of step Cannon’s ruling is, going against the conclusion of other courts that have addressed the appointment issue. The second part is noteworthy in highlighting that the Justice Department authorized the appeal. In her ruling Monday, Cannon took issue with what she characterized as the department's lack of oversight of Smith, so the special counsel’s statement reinforces the point that he can’t just do whatever he wants.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AlbertSpangler@lemmings.world 6 points 3 months ago

Apparently she has been overruled on appeal many times before (often with an undercurrent of "... just no"), so it is likely.

Of course, nothing will happen before the election, which is the whole point. And after that, it's probably all irrelevant anyway.