this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
920 points (91.6% liked)

Political Memes

5516 readers
722 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

PS.

I would for vote Kamala. I would vote for a cactus with sunglasses if it had the Democratic nomination. You would do yourself well to consider anything that is weaking the resolve of the anti-trump sentiment straight poison to your brain. We have only one job this novemeber and that is to stop trump. The Supreme Court has given him the status of king. Quit acting like your vote is sacred and start realizing your vote is your final cry before your rights are forfeited.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 124 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I am an unapologetic leftist, and, like most other leftists, I do not believe that engaging in the liberal democratic process will, or even can, bring about my ideal society. However, while I don't think voting is likely to make things meaningfully better, I do think it can prevent things from getting meaningfully worse. Maybe fascism can't be defeated with votes, but I can't see how anything is lost by trying. I mean, why make it easier on the fascists? I'm sure the fascists won't just give up because they lost an election, but that's not a reason to hold the door open for them. Again, I don't think voting for Biden (or whoever the Democratic candidate ends up being) is going to make things much better, but I do think not voting for him could make things much worse. So, we (leftists) should all vote for the Democrats this November. Not because it's going to get us nearer to our ideal, or our ultimate goals, but because it might help prevent the US from being taken over by fascists.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Change requires sustained momentum. Bouncing back and forth between Republicans and protest voting against Democrats. Is a sure fire way to see no change. If we were to say, show solidarity and dedication to keep all Republicans from elected office. Republicans would lose relevance and slink away. They might try masquerading under a different name like economic liberals playing Libertarian that generally vote Republican. But they will lose influence.

Once that happens. Then we focus on the worst of the Democrats, primarying every single one and driving them out. That sustained momentum and push is what's needed. To keep the fascist and the wealthy scattered and disorganized like they've kept the left. Though the left has done a fair share of that to itself. The right will eat itself as well especially once they're not winning.

[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, basically if the Republicans can be crushed in an election or two - Not just defeated, but absolutely demolished - then it could lead to them dissolving, and lead to the Democrats splitting and pushing the Overton window back left

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'd still argue that's a bit too short-term. It would have to last years. Not just elections. Probably 3 to 4 presidential elections at minimum. A good decade absence from from National political relevance will get the message across.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It starts with this election. You're looking down the barrel. No one wants you to pull the trigger america. Step back.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How sustained are we talking? We ushered in the Biden presidency with a huge mandate in 2020, and snuffed out the alleged “red wave” in ‘22 due to republicans’ reprehensible views on denying women bodily autonomy.

Biden and the establishment Dems have squandered this time by telling Americans who are suffering economically that the economy is doing great. That Biden is better than FDR, while our public infrastructure crumbles and our most popular social programs are at risk of closure.

When should we expect the Democrats to actually do something meaningful that improves the vast majority of normal people’s lives?

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The Biden administration has been directly addressing that crumbling infrastructure with the largest federal infra investment in modern history. It just happens to be boring so the media doesn't talk about it.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Ok, so private contractors who are pals with Congress critters get massive checks from the taxpayers to maybe do something, but we won’t see any tangible improvements for at least a decade.

What are they doing in particular? Shouldn’t Biden be making his case as part of his campaign for president? It seems that whenever he gets pressed for details, he just gets flippant and says he’s done more for the American people than FDR and we’re just too stupid to realize it. I’m just not seeing it. I do see a record amount of oil and gas drilling, asylum seekers still in cages while building more of Trump’s wall for him, massive arms sales to enrich military contractors and slaughter innocents in the middle east, and a seeming lack of interest in protecting voter rights and civil liberties. So to me, it seems nothing has changed with Biden from the neoliberal status quo over the last 25 years. Considering he’s over 80, that’s not a huge surprise. Is it the media’s job to advertise Biden’s accomplishments for him?

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

We don't need to wait for the Republicans to stop existing before we get representation in exchange for our votes. With a more representative electoral system like Ranked Choice voting, people would be free to vote for those that best represents them, secure in the knowledge that their vote would still be counted even if their preference didn't win. Still counted against the republicans.

You see, we can have democracy and freedom at the same time. How we vote is controlled at the state level, so we should be able to make these changes in blue states where republicans have less influence.

Unless of course, the democrats in power in those blue states aren't interested in democracy.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

So long as the republicans exist, the amendments necessary to get ranked choice voting wont happen. So yes actually, we do need to wait for them to stop existing

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Do you have your guns, beans, and gasoline ready in case the fascists do win in November?

[–] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Nobody said it would be pretty.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Will your privilege save you when The Fall occurs?