Melbourne

1870 readers

51 users here now

This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.

The focus of our discussions is based around things that affect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.

Full Community Guidelines

Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)

Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)

Feedback & Suggestions

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

RustyRaven@aussie.zone

briongloid@aussie.zone

bot001@aussie.zone

Daily Discussion Thread: ✔️✔️✔️ Thursday, July 18, 2024 (aussie.zone)

submitted 4 months ago by Seagoon_@aussie.zone to c/melbourne@aussie.zone

202 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Force_majeure123@aussie.zone 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The best indicator for who will be president in America is, in my opinion, the betting markets. At this point they are basically the collective opinion of people who make money predicting these things based on all available evidence. Currently Trump is about a four to one favourite to win according to this indicator. Pretty amazing

[–] RustyRaven@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think people put too much stock in the "assassignation attempt = win" idea though. There are a whole bunch of things that were always considered to be true about US politics that Trump has proven to not actually be the case - a few years ago it would have been considered a rule of politics that someone who was even accused of a crime, suspected of sexual assaults etc. would never be able to win an election. Trump has broken all the "rules" so far, I don't think this is any different.

[–] Baku@aussie.zone 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

a few years ago it would have been considered a rule of politics that someone who was even accused of a crime, suspected of sexual assaults etc. would never be able to win an election.

Has that ever been a thing in America?

[–] Aradina@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

One dude a long time ago lost because he couldn't spell potato

[–] StudChud@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Currently Trump is about a four to one favourite to win according to this indicator

I don't bet/gamble and have no idea what this means lol I have never understood the betting ratio thing "2 to 1". Like, is that in favour of trump or against? No clue lol.

[–] Baku@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago

I think when it's phrased like that, it means in favour of whoever was mentioned. Based on the phrasing, I take it the consensus is that for every 4 people who like (or perhaps bet?) on Trump, 1 likes (or bets) on Biden. I think

[–] Force_majeure123@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It's like rolling a five sided dice, four faces are trump; and if you bet $100 on trump to win, and he does, your profit would only be $20

[–] StudChud@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I see! Thank you! Explained like that it makes sense! I will try to store this information in my brain hahah

Using that example, if someone bet $100 on Biden, would that mean they get $400?

Edit: no. Would that mean they would profit $80, and end up with $180?

[–] Force_majeure123@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago

You would end up with 400 assuming the betting companies didn't take commision, but they do.

[–] Force_majeure123@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago

No you'd end up with 500