Technology

59761 readers

3295 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

804

Survey shows most people wouldn't pay extra for AI-enhanced hardware | 84% of people said no (www.techspot.com)

submitted 4 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

167 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Companies are going all-in on artificial intelligence right now, investing millions or even billions into the area while slapping the AI initialism on their products, even when doing so seems strange and pointless.

Heavy investment and increasingly powerful hardware tend to mean more expensive products. To discover if people would be willing to pay extra for hardware with AI capabilities, the question was asked on the TechPowerUp forums.

The results show that over 22,000 people, a massive 84% of the overall vote, said no, they would not pay more. More than 2,200 participants said they didn't know, while just under 2,000 voters said yes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wish products followed your lead and had no AI features, 1995 Toyota Corolla :/

[–] Kraiden@kbin.run 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I think you're being sarcastic, but I unironically agree. Cars and fridges can, and should stay dumb, with the notable exception of battery management systems in electric vehicles. That's the single acceptable use case for a car IMHO.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Oh I absolutely agree, some things don't need to be "smart".

Imagine if someone put a microchip in a potato peeler claiming that it would add features like "sensing the amount of pressure applied to the potato to ensure clean peels". The reason they haven't done that is that data would only benefit the user, and they can't think of a way to have it benefit the company's profit margins.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I think car play is a wonderful feature. My car should absolutely allow syncing up to my phone. I don’t think it should telemetry or anything like that though. But I think internal process monitoring should also be a thing. Display error codes, show me that a tire is low, monitor a battery, etc. but the manufacturer shouldn’t get that info. My car shouldn’t know my sex life, and the manufacturer definitely shouldn’t