[-] jaschop@awful.systems 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I just don't think they're smart enough to make a dent in an actually competitive industry, no matter how much espionage they got.

They may throw some cash around and buy their way into a niche field that actually has a business model, but I don't see how the espionage potential would help them much. To break into a difficult domain based on that, you would need the smart humans who can tell you what you are looking at.

Maybe it would be possible if you assume competent shady management, that is willing to invest heavily in human capital and systematically violate every privacy policy in the world. I think that's just not how they operate.

[-] jaschop@awful.systems 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I think we have already seen what direct replacement by AI companies looks like, and it's not pretty. Want an image for an ad but you're too cheap for a designer? There's a chatbot for that. Want to represent yourself in court? There's a chatbot for that. Slopplications of that sort did capture some demand for services, hardest felt by writers/graphic designers because you can more easily get away with a steep drop in quality there (for a little while).

I don't believe a takeover of that sort can happen in more sophisticated cases. Critical knowledge in SW (speaking from my wheelhouse) isn't some guarded secret-burger-sauce-recipe kind of knowledge. It's vast amounts of knowledge, organized and made actionable through effort and built-up skills. It's not knowledge they would have to replicate, it's labour. And I don't think they can privacy-violation their way to replicate a domain-specific knowledge worker from a chat history.

[-] jaschop@awful.systems 1 points 4 hours ago

Wow, no upvotes. None of you did, then? Shame, it really holds up well. And you will get my previous comment.

(DM me if you need access.)

[-] jaschop@awful.systems 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

So, who else did rewatch Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World recently?

[-] jaschop@awful.systems 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This rational animation channel seems to focus pretty non-stop on AI-risk crank talking points. Can't tell by skimming if they're engaging critically, but it seems unlikely.

And now you're apparently inspired to make a cutsiefied rendering of a slop machine running prompts, which is likened to a child being encouraged to explore.

I don't wanna shit on the art or anything, but it seems like the general AI psyop is getting to you a little.

[-] jaschop@awful.systems 2 points 3 days ago

Having gone through the setup as an SSL terminator, it did have a bunch of unnecessary pain, though I now like my setup a lot. I'll have to blog about it once I set up my blog. I can't speak to the performance, though I would care about that once I run something more involved.

After looking at caddy a little harder, I can't help but notice some sneerable qualities...

  • AGENTS.md since April 2026
  • AI code welcome if disclosed
  • sponsored by warp "The #1 coding agent"
[-] jaschop@awful.systems 1 points 3 days ago

I'm using acme.sh for that. It also supports Hetzner API btw.

[-] jaschop@awful.systems 5 points 4 days ago

I liked the take take, though it is put in perspective by the fact that he bought the "AI will revolutionize SW Engineering" story.

AI has enabled me to be more daring in my work and offered more difficult problems to tackle. It’s intoxicating, but also tiring. The productivity gains are real, but I wouldn’t put a multiplier on them. It all averages out around 20-25% individual productivity increase.

(from the first post on his blog)

[-] jaschop@awful.systems 7 points 5 days ago

Just realized this is also how I feel about Element.

[-] jaschop@awful.systems 15 points 5 days ago

I work with GitLab a lot. I think it's better for organizations than using GitHub, but my SW Engineer Spidey sense gives me death spiral vibes.

They've swallowed the AI Kool-Aid and are redesigning the UI to push their Chatbot on you (disabled by my org fortunately, but I still see it). They are feature creeping the fuck out of their already bloated product and are engineering features specifically to keep lots of usefull stuff behind the paid tiers, which are getting more expensive.

It's fine for institutional use if you have sane admins, but long-term I 100% bet on Forgejo.

[-] jaschop@awful.systems 18 points 6 days ago

This gives me very good vibes. The kids are all right. Maybe not economically, probably not, but in spirit at least.

9

Build Golf! Code Golf, but for Builds! Uhhh, that's sort of it.

I remember being very slightly intrigued by the concept of code golf a long time ago. But I mostly took notice of people taking it in very esoteric directions, and even before that it was pretty much orthogonal to writing the kind of useful code I care about.

But just now my brain rubbed 2 neurons together, and made the connnection to another problem that has bothered me quite often. How do you do a minimal build of some thing without some "helpful" 300 LoC boilerplate. I want like, 2 files with 3 lines each and one command to run.

Okay, there will be a couple complications to consider to avoid this going down a hacky direction like Code Golf. Like, how much tooling do you depend upon? Do you have to install a package? How many (hundred) packages does that depend upon? (Looking at you React.) But the general idea is, how to you get (for a specific task or category of tool) in a minimalist way from plain-text in git to running machine code? (or like, HTML if you're building for the web) It's a challenge of taste more than discrete optimization! If tools will reign over others in this sphere, it should be because they cater to refined tastes!

Soooo, that's my prompt. Ideas in all directions welcome. Concept for actually practically realizing this? Overly complex unworkable scoring rules? Personal fave minmal project templates? Feel free to evolve on this, or not, I'm not your boss.

1
wir😏iel (lemmy.nz)
submitted 3 weeks ago by jaschop@awful.systems to c/wir_iel@feddit.org
15
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by jaschop@awful.systems to c/notawfultech@awful.systems

Dear god. Why are note-taking projects such a magnet for slop bros?

I'm on a bit of a quest to build up some self-hosted services for me and friends & family, partially because Ad- & AI-infested big tech slop was making me sick and also to become a better sysadmin. General requirement was notes available anywhere and decent editing on mobile.

I was about to rip my hair out, when every session for weeks digging into options ended in frustration. Every project with somewhat decent features had some meh aspects and became worse the longer I looked. And there are so many of them. You can drown your self in "Best FOSS Note-taking App in $(date +%Y)" listicles. Here's a list of over a hundred projects.

I suspect it's a bit of the shopping list problem. It's such a basic idea, that every ambitious clueless dev has it once while picking a hobby project. But note-taking also definitely has a place in toxic self-optimization / hustle culture. Some of the more developed project strike me as that.

I won't mention every basic note-talking project with a CLAUDE.md that I stumbled on, but here's some of the more disappointing lowlights:

  • Joplin main developer was one-shot. Added agent instructions to the repo this year and some provisions for his personal vibecoding rig to .gitignore. Also it's not a bug if the AI chat button is visible even if AI features are disabled, because how would people find out about the AI features then?
  • Notesnook seems okay-ish, but they're part of the mall ninja club. Business partnership with Kagi & Tuta.
  • Standard Notes was the least suspect to me. Later found out they Copilot-Review all of their PRs. (same as Notesnook btw)
  • I even considered going with a self-hosted binary of Obsidian. They don't get instant-disqualified by promoting themselves as AI-anything. And if you don't have a project you can trust, you might as well throw yourself at the most established option and pray.

I was running out of places to look for alternatives, when I remembered Open Slopware. You can guess how shocked I was, when note-software made up one of the biggest sublists in there. Through the shortlist of recommendations I ended up looking at Flatnotes. That project might be just enough notes for me.

97

Leftist streamer Vaush applies his unifying "everything I don't understand is Epstein shit" thesis to the fediverse.

Article from the clip: https://medevel.com/why-the-fediverse-isnt-mainstream-and-why-it-might-be-the-future-of-safe-private-social-media/

118
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by jaschop@awful.systems to c/the_pack@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/41886055

I drive rule

240

Was looking for a terminal that can render LazyVim. It's looking like Alacritty (definitely not ghostty).

16
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by jaschop@awful.systems to c/notawfultech@awful.systems

Too early to see if it's viable. I'm doing my part in the GitHub trenches.

EDIT: They pinned my no-AI policy issue. I think they're pure of heart, lads.

62
1
submitted 6 months ago by jaschop@awful.systems to c/ich_iel@feddit.org
97
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by jaschop@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

...which is of course, because they should be prompting harder. Unusually savage heise remarks:

Whether the hallucination-prone generative AI itself is even suitable for unleashing the hoped-for productivity revolution does not seem to be a question for the consultants.

220
1
submitted 8 months ago by jaschop@awful.systems to c/ich_iel@feddit.org
view more: next ›

jaschop

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago