I could’ve sworn there was a study that showed phones are less of a problem than gigantic cars, but that may have been damage/death toll instead of crash rate.
OPEN UP AND ACCEPT YOUR WINNING!
Could be argued it was always just a “graphic improving” technology, and has simply moved past the point of equivalent exchange.
This isn’t a source, it’s an anecdote.
I bit the bullet to see what it actually does. duck.ai doesn’t recognize the image alone as anything more than a pixelated thumbnail, and the entire link being sent just has it spit out that there is indeed an attempt to “inject” a role play prompt.
This is a stupid as it sounds.
Pretty sure it asks you what life you lead during onboarding does it not?
If you set your step quota to 10 steps, you can both hit your quota and have gained nothing from it. This is a problem with users setting quotas too low, not a problem of the device giving bad information.
Could this not be said for IDEs with code awareness such as M$’s intellisense, among other tools that accelerate development speed?
What you are describing isn’t an AI problem, is people taking a two week bootcamp and calling themselves a software engineer.
It’s not scaremongering, it’s advertisement.
Sharp rise in incidents of humans being idiots, more like it.
If you give an LLM something you tell is a sandbox, that is if fact not a sandbox, it’s not “escaping users control” when it treats the open internet as part of the sandbox. You explicitly told it that it did not have access to the open internet!
putt.day #115 ⛳ 7/12 Albatross 🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟡🟢 https://putt.day/s/ORzEKKsVzHji