[-] lightstream@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

Just use your own brain and eyeballs.

We're going to need something a bit more robust than that I'm afraid. People who fall for conspiracy after conspiracy are using their own brain and eyeballs. Even schizophrenics use their own brain and eyeballs.

If someone's childhood photos show snow-free Christmases, is that enough for them to declare climate change a hoax?

People need to understand the scientific method better. What a hypothesis is, the importance of falsifiability. There is no truth in the universe, you can't determine what is true and what is false by looking inside yourself, or by trusting your gut. There is no truth. That is the universe we live in.

[-] lightstream@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

“physical pen testing”

oh I've seen that on the ButtSharpies subreddit

[-] lightstream@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 years ago

Eh, that’s pretty metal.

It's definitely pretty, and as thermite is a mixture of metal powder and metal oxide, your statement is entirely correct.

[-] lightstream@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago

ah they were making a nice and lame pun (anova brand == another brand)

[-] lightstream@lemmy.ml 54 points 2 years ago

They had a veto and they also had the Tories

[-] lightstream@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 years ago

It's not the image, it's a normal image. The server does the hard work when you make the request, and then it just builds the image accordingly.

[-] lightstream@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 years ago

Do you vote? Because it's the same principle - how one person votes might be irrelevant, but millions of people voting is powerful. This is true even though corporations have outsized influence on the political process.

Likewise, a single person deciding to not eat meat one day a week or replace one car journey with cycling is nothing in the global scheme of things, but a billion people all doing it will have more impact on the environment than any corporation ever could.

[-] lightstream@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 years ago

just fancy phone keyboard text prediction.

..as if saying that somehow makes what chatGPT does trivial.

This response, which I wouldn't expect from anyone with true understanding of neural nets and machine learning, reminds me of the attempt in the 70s to make a computer control a robot arm to catch a ball. How hard could it be, given that computers at that time were already able to solve staggeringly complex equations? The answer was, of course, "fucking hard".

You're never going to get coherent text from autocomplete and nor can it understand any arbitrary English phrase.

ChatGPT does both those things. You can pose it any question you like in your own words and it will respond with a meaningful and often accurate response. What it can accomplish is truly remarkable, and I don't get why anybody but the most boomer luddite feels this need to rubbish it.

[-] lightstream@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 years ago

I cannot wait until architecture-agnostic ML libraries are dominant and I can kiss CUDA goodbye for good

I really hope this happens. After being on Nvidia for over a decade (960 for 5 years and similar midrange cards before that), I finally went AMD at the end of last year. Then of course AI burst onto the scene this year, and I've not yet managed to get stable diffusion running to the point it's made me wonder if I might have made a bad choice.

[-] lightstream@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 years ago

.. just don't tell them it was with yourself

[-] lightstream@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 years ago

I'm gonna guess you're a Windows user :D

view more: next ›

lightstream

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 6 years ago