That was really difficult to read/understand. I added punctuation to make it more clear, at least to me.
What is one of those "Oh my god, I wish someone had explained THIS system to me when I was younger" moments, that really sticks out to you from your experience?
I use opencode with locally-hosted llama.cpp - usually with qwen3.6-35b-a3b.
I tried opencode go for a couple month, and its definitely nice to have an lln runner with more gram and more GPUs, but I prefer to have all my stuff local whenever it's possible. Also, I'd use up my token allotments fairly quickly on opencode go.
I also tried opentouter and it, too, was great - many more models. But I exhausted by credits even quicker than opencode go, and its also not local.
What about the trope of lighting up after sex?
E.g., NAS on my LAN, especially for streaming high res video to devices in my house.
I don't code so I can't possibly audit FOSS software. However, I also can't audit proprietary software. Lots of people can and do audit FOSS software, though, and can and do share their findings. But no matter how many people "audit" propietary software, it remains propietary - a black box. Untrustable, especially considering corporations' incentives and historical actions.
Why are you sharing a product/service that's in maintenance mode? From the README:
Trilium is in maintenance mode - see details in #4620
I recommend TriliumNext Notes, a current and active fork.
Thanks for this very rational pep talk!
mike_wooskey
0 post score0 comment score



The option is called "Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information", which suggests that by selecting the option, you want them to not sell or share your information. But in parentheses it adds "slide left to opt out of sale/share", which suggests that disabling the option means for them to not sell or share your information.
I think it is the next move (not the first) in enshittifying bitwarden. I think the first move was the leadership change announced in May.