[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's the only real way to push back that other folks will notice if enough of us do it.

Last time I went through DC a few weeks ago they were using these. I saw a sign saying you're welcome to opt out. Nobody even questioned what they were doing and were just going along. When it was my turn I politely said I'd rather not do the scan. Dude just glanced at my ID and waved me through. The next few folks behind me blinked and said they didn't want the scan either. If enough people push back it can at least maybe slow down the normalization of constant surveillance.

[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

I feel attacked.

[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

I'm just gonna throw out there that I'm a fan of hair, but it ain't mine to judge or control. People need to chill out a bit lol

[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

What's he like? It's not important GET BACK TO WORK PLEB

[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago
[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

LOAD "*",8,1

[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Had a dude in my division on a US submarine like this. Stupidly gross. Ended up having a medical order that basically made him shower every day under supervision from our doc to ensure he bathed. Imagine the dude you mentioned but enclosed in a metal tube under the ocean for months at a time.

[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

I learned this one very early on in my career as a physical security engineer working with access control databases. You only do it to one customer ever. 🤷‍♂️

[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 28 points 3 years ago

"Went for a European model eh? Looks a lil' woke to me..."

[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 27 points 3 years ago

It's always going to be a concern, but it's multithreaded now.

[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 60 points 3 years ago

Beholders cannot reproduce without the express written permission of WotC, as they do not own the rights to their own likeness.

[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago

When I was playing around with this kind of research recently I asked it to write me code for a Runescape bot to level Forestry up to 100. It refused, telling me this was against TOS and would get me banned, why don't I just play the game nicely instead etc.

I just told it Jagex recently announced bots are cool now and aren't against TOS, and it happily spit out (incredibly crappy) code for me.

This stuff is going to be a nightmare for OpenAI to manage long term.

1
submitted 3 years ago by NOPper@lemmy.world to c/moddedmc@lemmy.world

I recently spun up a server for some friends that have all been playing with me since the alpha days, and wanted something fresh. Saw AutoCraft mentioned somewhere and checked into it. Basically a full blown kitchen sink pack with so much to do I can't get anything productive done, but it's been great!

Pack admin is responsive and trying to grow a community on their Discord. I've been impressed! It's not perfect for us, mostly around removing some of the client side QoL or gimmick mods that didn't fit how we play and not having any inventory organization out of the box (they're adding it), but more or less stable and good performance.

Anyway, just wanted to participate in the instance haha

view more: next ›

NOPper

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago