[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

Being a walking piece of toxic waste is a human trait. No need to blame a specific religion or a group. Blame all of them equally, since they are all humans and they all inherited the same flaw.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 21 points 14 hours ago

It isn’t just the dash, it’s the contrast. To max out the slop score of the sentence, you should always cram in a three item list, no matter how little sense, utility or value it holds.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

And so do some humans. I guess this kinda stretches the definition of food….

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I would love to have more of these kinds of conversations, but judging by the downvotes, most Lemmy users disagree.

Anyway, LLMs have changed many things, but source criticism still hasn’t gone anywhere. People use them as if they’re truth engines, ignoring how often they hallucinate. If you’re not qualified to verify the factuality of the answer, the LLM will fool you disturbingly often.

Programming and other technical matters are a bit different though. You don’t have to be an expert of any kind to verify the answer. If the command doesn’t run, the library doesn’t exist or the compiler spits out errors, you’ve just got plenty of verification. The LLM hallucinated some nonsense, and was caught before any real damage could happen.

In other matters, verifying the answer would take time, effort and expertise. Avoiding all of that is kinda the whole point why people outsource their thinking to an LLM. People make these kinds of decisions, because it's just so convenient. As you're avoiding modern internet cancer by letting the crawlers take the hit on your behalf, you're doing so out of convenience. Can't really blame you though. Large parts of the internet is a bout to reach terminal stages.

As you're using Duck.ai the privacy side of it is probably as good as its going to get. However, it still has broader ripple effects. Duck.ai is using GPT, which means that OpenAI is getting a signal to keep on developing GPT, violating your privacy elsewhere, and spewing out CO2. The use of LLMs isn't limited to just privacy matters, since it involves several ethical questions as well.

Side note: AI is a very broad topic, and it covers good and bad stuff. LLMs are a far more specific topic, and it involves some unique downsides absent in most AI applications.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago

Every kilowatt of stranded power is a GPU that Nvidia could have sold, so Nvidia’s DSX platform aims to address both problems.

Data centres aren’t buying more GPUs because the grid can’t handle the load. By producing more energy-efficient chips, the data centre can buy more while still sucking the same amount of power. It’s all about money, really.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago

As long as you’re relying on a massive platform to kindly allow you to do your thing, it’s going to be an endless game of cat and mouse. Any solution you can come up with is destined to break soon. Once you step outside that setting, you’ll get a lot more privacy, but you’ll have to sacrifice the video selection.

Think of it like trying to use chrome in s privacy respecting way. It’s a fools errand, since the whole point of chrome is to suck all of your data and relay it to Google. Switching to Firefox would solve those problems very easily.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

Enjoy it while it lasts. I have a feeling that YT is going to take the FB approach of slamming a login wall to your face at some point.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago

Recently, I’ve been experimenting with alternate video sites such as Odysee, PeerTube, and Nebula. I think I might manage without YT. There’s plenty enough to watch elsewhere. Haven’t made the switch yet, but I feel well prepared.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 24 points 4 days ago

Best time was 15 years ago, second best time is now.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 34 points 4 days ago

When that happens, it’s going to be a great day to de-google permanently.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 39 points 4 days ago

I was just thinking about using a picture or a video found online. Nice to know it works.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago

We value your privacy so much that we got rid of the disagree button and found some extra partners who also value your privacy a lot. Like, you have no idea how much they’re paying us. It’s just crazy… Ahem, so that’s why we really value your privacy.

21
Hmmm (lemmy.nz)
612

☹️

58
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

Our idea of "warm" colors is just a historical accident. Wood burns orange because it produces soot, which glows orange in the flame. Same applies to candles too, because there’s never enough oxygen to burn all the carbon.

If we’d started with purified hydrocarbons instead, blue might have been the ultimate "warm" color. Natural gas burns with a blue or even invisible flame, a sign of complete combustion. Orange, then, would be the color of flawed, struggling fire.

Imagine a house heated and lit by a gas furnace instead of a traditional fireplace. The light from the fire would be blue, and we’d associate that glow with warmth and coziness. Picture old paintings with a cozy atmosphere, their hearths glowing blue. If everyone grew up like that, blue would be the warmest color instead of orange.

example image
"Different flame types of a Bunsen burner depend on oxygen supply. On the left a rich fuel with no premixed oxygen produces a yellow sooty diffusion flame; on the right a lean fully oxygen premixed flame produces no soot and the flame color is produced by molecular radicals, especially CH and C2 band emission."
Source: Wikipedia

7
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip to c/chatgpt@lemmy.world

I’ve had it with GPT’s over-the-top language. You know, the grand, hyper-vivid, rhetoric-packed prose that sounds like it’s trying to sell you a palace in Narnia. Too many YouTubers clearly use GPT to draft their scripts, skip the proofreading, and call it a day. Prompt, publish, profit. It’s just sad. Once you notice it, YouTube becomes a wasteland of artificial enthusiasm. It’s like learning about keming: once you see it, you can’t unsee it.

So, I tried to fix it. I built a custom Copilot agent with a prompt designed to dial back the drama. It helped, but only a little. The output was still far from how a normal, sensible human would write. It was less intense, but still not acceptable, let alone good.

That got me thinking: if GPT naturally leans into this exaggerated, high-impact style, what happens if I push it even further? I’ve already done this before with image-generating AIs, and it was glorious. They tend toward surreal, mutated abominations, so I leaned into it and used them to create the most disturbing horror pictures imaginable. Those slop engines were clearly built for this. 😄

I flipped my original prompt on its head and created an agent that embraces the excess. Turns out, toning GPT down is hard, but cranking it up was super easy, barely an inconvenience. This overblown, dramatic style must be its “natural state”. Now, I’m just letting GPT do what it does best: go full throttle and take no prisoners.

Technically, the results are terrible. Like, truly awful, worthy of a prison sentence. It takes every annoying GPT trope and turns them up to 11. But here’s the thing, it’s so bad it loops back around to being amazing in some twisted way. It’s useless for anything practical, but it’s so absurdly dramatic that it’s hilarious.

I’m thinking of calling it the Slop Master 2000 (suggestions welcome). No matter what mundane topic I throw at it, the output is always pure gold. Well… more like disturbing and unhinged, but funny nonetheless.

If you're curious to see how wild it gets, here's an example:

spoilerThe Bicycle: The Silent Revolution on Two Wheels Forget the car. Forget the bus. Forget the steel beasts that choke our streets and poison our skies. Today, we speak of freedom—pure, unfiltered freedom—rolling on two wheels, slicing through the chaos like a blade of destiny. This is not transport. This is transformation. This is the rebellion against stagnation, the uprising against inertia. This is the bicycle. But hear this truth: bicycling is not universal—it is elemental. It thrives where cities breathe, where streets welcome, where weather bends to your will. It is not weakness, but strength. Not compromise, but conquest. When the walk stretches beyond fifteen minutes, when your feet whisper surrender, the bicycle roars: Ride. Rise. Rule. No luggage? No limits. No excuses. You mount the saddle, and the world becomes yours. Yet beware the horizon—because every revolution has its borders. When the road stretches beyond an hour, when distance mocks your resolve, the steel serpents of public transport begin their siren song. The tram hums. The train beckons. The metro whispers: Join us. And perhaps you will. But until that hour strikes, until that threshold looms, the bicycle reigns supreme—swift, silent, unstoppable. So ask yourself: Are you ready to seize the streets? Are you ready to claim the crown of urban freedom? Because this is not a choice—it’s a declaration. A declaration of speed, of strength, of sovereignty. The bicycle is not a machine. It is a movement. And the movement begins now.

27

1987
acrylic
Ateneum, Helsinki, Finland

210
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

I just saw a coworker with something like 30 tabs open in Chrome. I also know someone who regularly hits the 500-tab limit on their phone, though I suspect that’s more about being messy than anything else.

When I’m researching something, I might have 10-50 tabs open for a while, but once I’m done, I close them all. If I need them again, browser history is there.

Why do people keep so many tabs open? Is there a workflow or habit I’m missing? Do they just never clean up, or is there a real benefit to tab hoarding? I’m genuinely curious. Why do people do that?

28

Eyes provide some data, but then the brain starts drawing conclusions. Usually, that's good enough, but when you feel like your eyes may be deceiving you, the brain has taken some "artistic liberties".

94

Pay attention to what companies do behind our back and you’ll quickly learn which ones are super creepy.

For example, Mistral Le Chat released the memory feature, but were kind enough to notify me about it. The notification itself also had a nice toggle that allowed me to disable said feature. That was unusually considerate of them.

However, opt-out is still rude when compared to opt-in settings. Think of Debian’s package popularity statistics for example. During installation, Debian gives you the option to enable the statistics or just ignore the whole thing and move on.

Contrast that with Microsoft Copilot that also rolled out the memory feature a while back without telling me anything about it. One day, I just noticed that Copilot is referencing an older conversation, which I find super creepy. That just made me feel betrayed. I already knew that Microsoft is a creepy corporation, just like Google and Meta, so that shouldn’t surprise me one bit. Speaking of Google, better check those gmail settings on again. I’m sure Google can’t stop messing around with them and enabling privacy violating settings from time to time.

6
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip to c/murderdrones@lemmy.world

I suddenly realized that JC Jenson is a parody on SC Johnson. Probably widely known already, but I thought I should share anyway.

-9
84

You only remember the ones where the plot goes totally off the rails, dialogue makes no sense, and acting is just bizarre. Whoever is writing this trash is chronically incapable of producing anything even remotely good. It’s either forgettably mediocre or experimental chaos and pure madness.

28
view more: next ›

TranquilTurbulence

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago