[-] LaggyKar@programming.dev 2 points 10 hours ago

Hmm, maybe I was misremembering. On second thought I think it was actually 7digital I was thinking of that did the regional lossless, I forgot about that one. For example, the same album on Swedish and American stores:

https://se.7digital.com/artist/taylor-swift/release/the-life-of-a-showgirl-explicit-60581637?f=20%2C19%2C12%2C16%2C17%2C9%2C2

https://us.7digital.com/artist/taylor-swift/release/the-life-of-a-showgirl-explicit-60581637?f=20%2C19%2C12%2C16%2C17%2C9%2C2

[-] LaggyKar@programming.dev 3 points 12 hours ago

HDtracs also sells some stuff losslessly. Though one thing I've noticed I've noticed on both Qobuz and HDtracs is tha, in addition to only having some stuff losslessly, the availability of lossless varies by region. The same album might be sold lossless in one region and only lossy in another region.

[-] LaggyKar@programming.dev 1 points 12 hours ago

AAC-LC though works just about anywhere, and AFAIK is also patent free by now.

[-] LaggyKar@programming.dev 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Care to back that up? You wouldn't need a license to do something that copyright laws already allow you to do on their own. For example, making additional copies for your own personal use is perfectly legal, if allowed depends on your local fair use or private copying exemption law (provided you do it without circumventing DRM, e.g. via the analog hole), even though of course the movie studio wouldn't give you a license for that.

Of course, DRM is the real issue here, as due to anti-circumvention the movie industry controls who can legally make players for movies on DVD/Blu-Ray (unlike on VHS and CD).

You can’t rent your copy of Shrek out to people

That's literally how Netflix got started.

[-] LaggyKar@programming.dev 11 points 2 days ago

Reddit does have RSS feeds

[-] LaggyKar@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Unless they start adding cellular connectivity for serving ads. Though maybe the calculation doesn't work out, presumably most people would either connect the TV to the internet voluntarily, or they're not gonna use the TV:s UI much and thus not see many ads.

[-] LaggyKar@programming.dev 79 points 2 years ago

A big blocker that the article surprisingly doesn't talk about is tons of IoT stuff that uses 2G and 3G. Stuff like alarm systems, emergency phones, street light control, cars etc. Here in Sweden there was recently a report that thousands of elevators have emergency phones using 2G and 3G, and if the network is shut down you would no longer be allowed to use those elevators. And since 2018 all new cars in the EU has to have eCall, which alerts emergency services on a crash. Many of these use 2G and 3G, and if it stops working the car won't pass inspection so you'll no longer be allowed to drive it.

[-] LaggyKar@programming.dev 227 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A more expensive, clunkier product, with a bunch of needless fluff in it.

[-] LaggyKar@programming.dev 77 points 2 years ago

So you need to change two settings instead of one to side load. Seems rather pointless.

[-] LaggyKar@programming.dev 134 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

This is very outdated.

  • Catalyst doesn't exist anymore, it was replaced by AMDGPU-PRO years ago.
  • The Radeon Mesa driver (radeonsi) is generally faster than AMDGPU-PRO OpenGL for gaming, and has been for years. On the Vulkan side, performance is usually fairly close between the Mesa driver (RADV), AMDVLK and AMDGPU-PRO.
  • AMDGPU is just the kernel driver, which is used by both the Mesa drivers and AMDGPU-PRO, so why is it listed separately?
  • For Intel, I think the hardware was holding it back more than the driver, especially since they've replaced the classic Mesa drivers with Gallium based ones. But now they're doing the Arc stuff.
  • I don't know if I would say that Nvidia proprietary runs well
[-] LaggyKar@programming.dev 83 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

It doesn't seem to be targeting ad-blockers in particular (or other page customizing extensions), although that may result eventually. What it does do is let webpages restrict what web browsers and operating systems you are allowed to use, just like how SafetyNet on Android lets apps restrict you to using an OS signed by Google. That could end up with web pages forcing you to use a web browser and OS the big players like Google, Microsoft and Apple, blocking any less restrictive or less used competors like Firefox and Linux, thus creating a cryptographically enforced oligopoly. And even if they signed e.g. Firefox, it would only be certain builds of it. That would make it impossible to make a truly open-source browser that can access pages using this API. Quite concerning.

view more: next ›

LaggyKar

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago