this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
134 points (95.3% liked)

politics

19002 readers
3826 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 70 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Awww, whatsa matter little Clarence? You can dish it but not take it?

In a conversation with his law clerks two years following his confirmation, The New York Times reported Thomas expressed his desire to serve on the court until the year 2034.

"The liberals made my life miserable for 43 years," a former clerk remembered Thomas – who was 43 years old when confirmed – saying, according to The New York Times. "And I'm going to make their lives miserable for 43 years."

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago

So he's not even pretending. Cool.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What the hell did they do, take a shit on his frosted flakes?

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Worse, gave him civil rights.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 57 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's hideous because of corrupt, partisan people like you, Thomas! You should retire, collect the $1 million dollars per year for life from John Oliver, and let someone with ethics take your place...

[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

That offer expired. He’ll need to buy his own new motor coach now or talk to his billionaire friends

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He extended it on another late night talk show a couple days ago, still has the contract ready

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Once he retires, they're not going to keep taking his calls.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 6 points 4 months ago

John just appeared on Late Night with Seth Meyers and said he still has and would honor the original contact he has. As long as Thomas retires before the fall...

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

And I can't wait to do a nice little jig on Thomas' grave when that piece of shit dies. This court is entirely illegitimate.

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 24 points 4 months ago

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told his law clerks in the '90s that he wanted to serve for 43 years to make liberals' lives 'miserable'

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 24 points 4 months ago

projection. we know whose actions are nasty and hideous

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If it's too much to handle, you can always quit. No one is forcing you to do a job you hate.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

This is just a cry from Thomas for more payola from his concerned "friends".

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 17 points 4 months ago

Has he tried NOT taking Bribes from the People arguing Before the Court?

[–] Dramaking37@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm sure he could just retire and hang with his billionaire besty full time and he'd totally still be invited

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Like most Americans, he's hanging on to the position because of the "benefits".

[–] WookieMonster@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

Nah, those billionaire besties wouldn't pee on him if he was on fire if he retired. They wouldn't have any use for him then.

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

The shit heap I helped create is smelly.