this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
269 points (93.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35583 readers
374 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

...

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Report as spam and unsubscribe. If they send you more emails they are in violation of the law for the canned spam act.

[–] Fritto@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That last part doesn't sound right but I wish it did.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why doesn't it sound right? They are required by law to both have an unsubscribe button and to honor you opting out.

https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/can-spam-act-compliance-guide-business

[–] nero@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because it sounds like a stupid joke about a can of spam i assume

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It can be both real and a stupid pun. 😀

[–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

they are an awesome company though

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Once a company wouldn't stop emailing me despite unsubscribing. I sent them multiple emails with no response.

Then I heard that if enough people mark a sender as spam, Google starts automatically considering them spam for everyone. I emailed them to let them know this, and told them if they didn't remove me, I would mark them as spam which would affect them majorly.

They replied to my email within minutes and told me I was unsubscribed and would never receive another email from them lmao

[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Why would you issue a warning to a spammer instead of using the tools as intended, and just marking it as spam anyway? It clearly was. All you did here was pass the buck to someone else now.

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did both, but I wanted my email removed from their system. I hate my spam box being filled up if I can help it.

[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

Understandable. I really doubt emails actually get removed from systems they get sold at that point and kept in the database that's not actively used.

[–] PickTheStick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some email systems now won't mark things as spam. They'll have a popup window asking if you want them to help you unsubscribe from the shit. I about blew it when I saw that.

[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ive seen email systems with that, I've never seen an email system use that as a substitute for a Spam or junk flag however, I think maybe either you're confused or have a really odd mail client

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Gmail does it. Emails from mailing lists often have a header that specifies an email address you can email to unsubscribe (you just need to send an empty email with a subject of "unsubscribe" to the address). Gmail detects this header and asks you if you want to unsubscribe instead of marking as spam. If you do, it sends the unsubscribe email for you.

[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It usually is a footer, not a header, in my personal experience, these companies don't want the word "unsibscribe" put in your head until they are done trying to reel you in with other things. It would be asinine to put it as a header.

Also, the unsibscribe feature in Gmail is not the same as reporting as junk/spam, which Gmail still allows as an option.

Unsubscribe option attempts to use the email address as you've already mentioned. The spam and junk flag automatically moves mail from those addresses into your junk folder. These are not the same things.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, I meant a header as in where the things like the subject line, servers it was sent via, etc. are stored. It's a part of the email that isn't user-visible. The unsubscribe email isn't visible to the user unless you view the raw source of the email, but email clients can use it.

I know marking as spam isn't the same as unsubscribing. Gmail is trying to suggest unsubscribing instead of marking as spam which is reasonable (why mark it as spam when you could just unsubscribe and never get it in the first place?)

[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mark it as spam so that Google can add it to the metrics and stop allowing that account to spam everyone. If you just unsubscribe it only benefits you. If you flag it as spam it benefits everyone using the service.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Technically it's not considered spam if you opted in. Spam is unsolicited mail.

[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Technically there's no authority to determine if you ever did "opt in", so that is a moot point. I get spam all the time claiming I opted in, when I know I've not. Nothing in an email is a guarantee, to include statements that you wanted this email or agreed to be contacted.

[–] kostel_thecreed@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like a joke to me? I do not get the infuriating part.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Maybe it's personal preference, but I absolutely DESPISE companies who put this sort of cutesy, look how fun we are, but also very passive aggressive, bullshit on their communications.

This goes beyond mildly infuriating for me.

[–] meggied90@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm with you on that one. It feels like old people trying to be hip and modern, it doesn't feel genuine.

I have also never understood why a company would want to actively pressure you into letting them send you things you don't want. Isn't it just wasted bandwidth to blast emails to people who won't ever see or want them? So bizarre.

[–] Bigmodirty@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

No, they figure eventually you’ll come around or be a future $ for them later.

[–] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It doesn't help that their copy reads like a 2000s era "TeH pEnGuIn oV dEwM" cringepost

[–] Osa-Eris-Xero512@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

With the date range on that copyright notice, it well could be from back then

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Holds up spork...

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In this case, they're literally threatening that if you unsubscribe, you will receive harassing texts forever. That goes a large step further than "Jeff the unicorn will be sad."

I guess its based on "unicorns doesn't exist".

No one will send texts even if you unsubscribe. Only kidding

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty bold for a company with an address in mailing list range.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Might be in a different (though closely related) category but this brings to mind confirmshaming.

[–] TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is definitely an example of that.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's the sort of thing where the term seems like a 90% fit but I don't know if there's one that's more specific. Something like a confirm-threat but a very minor one.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

If someone pissed me off enough, I used to enter their email address every time a website wanted me to sign up for a newsletter. And if they asked me for my name while doing so, I'd enter a little message/insult for that person.

[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

That's not much of a threat. You could always block Jeff's number.

[–] STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Imagine if you broke up with someone or decided to stop being friend with them and they started acting like. Should be charged as stalking because "corporations are people too" so I can't see why legally that can't be the case.

[–] amio@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

A true thigh-slapper, that.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

does involuntary opt-in count?

[–] max@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

It does, and under sane laws, it’s also illegal.