this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
132 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

34988 readers
403 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Arotrios@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

“When the committee held an initial hearing on broadband permitting streamlining, including a draft of the American Broadband Deployment Act, no state or local government was invited to testify.

If you'd like to make your feelings known on this omission and the bill in general, here are the members of that committee - clicking on a rep will give you their contact information.

[–] L26@ttrpg.network 12 points 1 year ago

Fuck ISPs, fuck monopolists, fuck billionaires. That is all, thank you.

We had something similar in my city. Basically, we started building a broadband network, then our state legislature blocked new municipal service (we hadn't turned it on yet), so we were forced to sell it at a loss (we've almost finished paying off the debt). I have service from the new ISP (only offers service in my city), and it rocks, but has limited max speed. The laws changed, so we're trying it again.

I understand the high level complaints here because municipal ISPs could simply move costs to taxes to undercut competitors, but that argument falls flat when you see how private ISPs do exactly the same thing, but with lawsuits and promotional deals instead of taxes.

So I'm 100% in favor of municipal broadband, but I can see having some regulations there such as:

  • municipalies must allow other ISPs to offer service on their network
  • pricing of service must include all necessary maintenance of the network
  • a special provision that allows municipalities to offer a base free tier at an acceptable speed that's enough for remote school (say, 10/10 down/up); perhaps this is treated as a credit that any ISP could accept