this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
279 points (98.3% liked)

News

23361 readers
3283 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Retail chains like TJX, the parent company of TJ Maxx and Marshalls, are equipping some store employees with body cameras to deter shoplifting and improve safety. This is part of a growing trend in the retail industry, as stores respond to an increase in organized retail theft and violence against workers. However, some criminologists and worker advocates argue that body cameras are unlikely to be an effective deterrent and that retailers should focus on improving training, staffing, and other safety measures instead. There are also concerns that the body camera footage could be misused, such as to monitor and discourage union organizing. Overall, the implementation of body cameras in retail is a complex issue with pros and cons that retailers will need to carefully consider.

Summarized by Kagi Universal Summarizer

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 133 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

100% it's really for anti-union bullshit because who the fuck is stealing in full view of an employee where the employees having body cams would make a lick of difference?

Or is it meant to deter the employees from stealing? 🤔

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 55 points 5 months ago

Most likely it is there to blame the employee for not being busy enough or not doing everything perfectly with a customer.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They have a big issue with internal shrink.

[–] MalachaiConstant@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In other words, they have a systemic issue is where the threat of prosecution isn't enough to deter employees from supplementing income with theft.

I wonder what kind of conditions led to that.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

Guess they need to be lobbying for a better social safety net and perhaps higher minimum wage laws

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 78 points 5 months ago (6 children)

You could spend a lot of money on body cameras, or you could reduce your prices to being affordable again. I'd say either one has a decent chance of dissuading shoplifters.

But I suppose you can only write off the former.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 42 points 5 months ago

It’s probably more due to the lack of staff than price of goods, something else they could’ve addressed with that camera money.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

honestly, body cameras are more about liability after the fact. There's really only two reasons to strap a camera on somebody- liability defense (cops, armed security guards, etc,) and being able to monitor what the fuck they're doing. both are important when the individuals in question are armed. Not so much when the expected response is constructive cowardice.

There's absolutely no way a body camera would act as a deterrent when traditional and AI-enhanced security cameras that they're absolutely already using won't. Also, I'm not entirely sure I believe that there's massive waves of organized shoplifters.

There is- as noted in the article- a massive wave of unionization, though. and that would probably hurt their profits far more than any wave of shoplifting ever will.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I haven't been to TJ Max in forever. Aren't they a low cost clothing store?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Nothing is low cost anymore.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

I'm pretty sure you can write off shoplifted items as lost assets, so maybe just let them get shoplifted?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

reduce your prices to being affordable again

Uh, they don't get much cheaper in the new clothing market. If you want even cheaper than the cheapest, learn to thrift and repair.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I'd hate that as an employee. Imagine knowing that every time you talk to a coworker, it's recorded. Every time you sit for a few minutes to reset, it's recorded. Every time you check your phone, it's on camera.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago (1 children)

this is the real reason why they're doing it.

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Don't want them to unionize!

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Seriously.

Like if you think mass-shoplifting hurts them- that shit's already baked into the price of goods being sold before it ever happened.

Unionizing will hurt their profits far, far more than shoplifters ever will.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

(Fuck poverty and those who promote and embrace it)


shoplifting [is] already baked into the price of goods being sold

Tomorrow’s recipe adjusted based on yesterday’s shrink? 👨‍🍳

Question assumes a greedy entity will refuse to allow reduction of its profit margin.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Tomorrow’s recipe adjusted based on yesterday’s shrink? 👨‍🍳

Nope. They have fancy overpriced mathnerds (“actuaries”) that build models to predict future shrinkage and price that into today’s prices.

The shrinkage is paid for before it ever goes out the door. Probably, before it ever came in the door in the first place.

These mathnerds that work for these corporations are some of the best in the business of risk modeling. Second only to insurance companies.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Them actuaries 🤓

Just called all my friends and we decided to start a TJX shoplifter training school franchise. If we’re successful this year, do we stand a chance at adding a penny to prices next year?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Drusas@kbin.run 34 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

This is part of a growing trend in the retail industry, as stores respond to an increase in organized retail theft(1) and violence against workers(2)."

The first has been proven to be a lie. The second is true, especially since the pandemic began.

It's a sad state of affairs when retail workers need to wear cameras to protect themselves, but that is the only value. Not an alleged increase in organized theft. That is just the line being brought out by big companies like Target to excuse bad behavior on their part.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Fish@midwest.social 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Don't forget to turn on your body cam before clocking in!

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 28 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I feel like this is more about keeping tabs on the employees instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They legally can’t require you to do that. They can only require it to be on your person, as part of uniform, prior to clocking in. Operating the camera is considered a compensated task.

[–] Fish@midwest.social 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yet some supervisor or manager will argue that you "have to turn it before you clock in to make sure that it records everything." Wage theft is nothing new.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

They can say that. I’m just saying the employees will win a class action suit if they do.

If they want to protect the company against time theft, they can install a camera near the time clock.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (5 children)

No way in hell am I wearing a damn camera and volunteering to have my employer have a live video feed of everything I do at work while making next to nothing in wages. Hey, it's performance review time, sorry, we can't give you a raise because you have been chatting with your friends too much while on the clock. 1984 shit. Fuck that.

[–] Luccus@feddit.de 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Hello, I'm your boss. Saw you on your phone during your break in the video feed.

You've been asking for a raise for years. Unfortunately, you're a really good performer, always on time, good worker, and I've never heard anything negative that I could base my decision to deny your raise on. So I watched the video feed to find the most minuscule thing that I can pinpoint as a "problem". I was about to tell you that drinking water on the job significantly decreases your performance, but that post you made on your break is now going to be my reason. Screw you. I love money!

Sincerely, your favorite boss

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Hey boss,

Not sure what got into you. Given that we have literally hung out after work playing tabletop games and getting wasted, and I was planning to go to your wedding in September. Thought we were buds.

Anyway guy down the street offered me more money. So going to be working there now. Best of luck without the millions of dollars I made you last year and finding someone with my skillset.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SleepyBear@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I have this great idea to stop an increase in organized retail theft and violence against workers. STOP PRICE GOUGING GROCERIES AND PEOPLE WILL STOP STEALING THEM!

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Whats that? increase prices further, while cutting the ~~slaves~~ employee wages by 30%? What a grand idea!

[–] AngusTheNerd@feddit.uk 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

We had these where I worked, what a lot of people miss is these don't actually record until the person wearing it presses a button, it doesn't have the battery life to record, encode, then broadcast video for 8+ hours. No doubt when that becomes feasible they'll give it a go though.

In the UK we have to announce to everyone it's recording. The gangs and thieves know this and don't care. They were happy to attack and rob us when we already had store wide CCTV.

The only deterrent that worked was a security guard we had for a short while, but the company withdrew them because we weren't losing over 5% of our daily take to theft, ignoring that we got the guard because two people had been sent to hospital after being attacked by a gang of youths.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Businesses shouldn't be run by people who never have to even step foot on the premises. The people making the decisions (and proceeds!) should be the ones that actually have to live with those decisions and implement them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

CCTV already exists. What is this even

[–] modus@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Security theatre.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I hope eventually theres a document of like flagged words and phrases like that one online document of words and phrases that'll get you on a watch list from that.was going around very online circles a long time back. That way as a shopper I can say things or hold up pictures to the camera to create lots of false flags making their little AI throw the results to someone they gotta pay to review it.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Talk about meetings to get the union started and how it looks like we've already got enough committed votes in favour to get it going without worrying about what kind of propaganda they'll try to throw at the staff once they realize it's happening and that the other stores also seem to be on track and if they get the timing right, they won't be able to just shut that many down to quell it. Then think aloud about how we shouldn't be talking about this there because who knows what those fucking cameras are picking up and sending back to corporate.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Great point, I can't believe I didn't think of that. Gonna throw a BS name on the end of the union talk to to make them spend time trying to find someone who doesn't exist. "Steward Hingus Dingus says their confident they have a super majority of votes"

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

I'd imagine the biggest difference is that these employees could actually get fired if they turn theirs off.

[–] DevCat@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

The primary responsibilities of one job at a Marshalls in Miami Beach, Florida, are to maintain a “proper and professional stance” at the front of the store, act as a “visual deterrent to prevent potential loss/dishonesty” and wear a company-issued body camera. The description says that the camera is to record “specific events involving critical incidents for legal, safety, and training purposes.”

These employees, who wear a company-approved black vest, black pants and black shoes, are instructed not to stop or chase after shoplifting suspects.

It's the same reason I made sure the security cameras on my house are visible from the street. People with bad intentions just move on to easier targets.

They may have seen the studies down on police forces who adopted cameras. They saw a drop in complaints against officers, as well as fewer escalations by the public against officers. Likewise, they're hoping this translates to retail.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Stores are already full of security cameras. Shoplifters are generally aware of this. I'm not sure what this adds to that. I suppose it keeps someone employed.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

It's not for stopping theft, it's for intimidating workers

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I have a proposal for the next iteration of Tik Tok challenges, or whatever medium we're using to flaunt our bad decisions now-a-days: steal the cameras right off the employees.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] o_oli@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I noticed in my local supermarket in the UK they started wearing cameras too it's really weird. I'm really not sure what their goal is - it will never help shoplifting as much as static cameras, and seems a lot of effort to safeguard against abusive customers.

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 5 points 5 months ago

I just want to say that I appreciate how your comment has made me understand that writing run-on sentences without punctuation isn't a strictly American English language thing.

This sounds mean-spirited of me, but I actually mean it. Everybody always makes fun of the Americans for it. And I'm not saying I'm perfect, either. Poor grammar can bring us all together.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hey! Who want's to shop at a retailer where someone follows you around with a camera and the merchandise is overpriced? Raise your hand now! [crickets] Consumers will shop elsewhere. Making your business like the DPRK is not a winning strategy.

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Worked for London.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I am wondering when teachers will get these. Little Timmy literally took a bite out of another students neck? No, you can't say it was someone else, I have it on video!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They think price gouging is going to increase theft and they wanna be ready. They'd rather waste money on this (and on advocating the govt for harsher penalties) than lower them.

Friendly reminder: if you see someone stealing from target? No you didn't. That goes for target employees too. Here's hoping your bodycams up with as much "lost" footage as the cop's.

load more comments
view more: next ›