312
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 69 points 3 years ago

Didn't go far enough. He shouldn't be allowed to post a thing. That's worse than house arrest to him at this point.

I feel like they’re intentionally giving him a wide berth, so that when he inevitably violates the court-imposed restriction, the judge can turn around and say “look, I gave him as much consideration as I reasonably could, and he still violated the court’s orders, so I have no choice but to exercise punitive action”.

I positively cannot wait for the inevitable violation and consequent punitive action.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 8 points 3 years ago

You will be waiting indefinitely. When has he ever been punished for his antics? Why would that change now?

[-] Elderos@lemmings.world 3 points 3 years ago

Because of the criminal charges?

[-] Neato@kbin.social 33 points 3 years ago

Fulton County Superior Judge Scott McAfee signed the order banning Trump from contacting his codefendants or witnesses in the case, except through their attorneys. It also bans the former president from intimidating codefendants or witnesses in the case, including through posts on social media.

I thought witness tampering and jury intimidation were already crimes...

[-] nl_the_shadow@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago

Gotta ELI5 for this guy.

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 28 points 3 years ago

like parenting a 12 y.o. at this point

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 21 points 3 years ago

At best it's more like a ~9 year old, as he speaks at a 4th grade level. My boys are twelve and they're much more capable of being reasoned with than Trump is.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 28 points 3 years ago

3...2...1...and he breaches the restrictions.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 31 points 3 years ago

And now for the enforcement!

... Infinity... Infinity minus one... Infinity minus two...

[-] bazus1@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago

Waaait, infinity minus two is still infinity.

Oh.

[-] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 years ago

But (for the non-limit ordinal infinities only) it's a different infinity.

[-] Navarian@lemm.ee 20 points 3 years ago

How remote are the chances that this stops him even slightly from spouting absolute nonsense into the void?

[-] HWK_290@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago

What are the chances I blink in the next 10 seconds?

[-] bazus1@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago

This popcorn is so frickin’ good

[-] RooRLoord420@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago

Who has "pending contempt charge" on their bingo card?

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 3 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A judge on Monday limited former President Trump’s social media use in connection to the an indictment in Georgia that charged him with 13 counts related to his and his allies’ efforts to overturn the 2020 election in the state.

Fulton County Superior Judge Scott McAfee signed the order banning Trump from contacting his codefendants or witnesses in the case, except through their attorneys.

“The Defendant shall perform no act to intimidate any person known to him or her to be a codefendant or witness in this case or to otherwise obstruct the administration of justice,” the order says.

This is not the first time the former president has been warned to limit his social media use and public statements in one of his ongoing legal battles.

U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing Trump’s federal 2020 election case, warned both sides of the case to take “special care” to avoid making any statements that could intimidate witnesses or prejudice the jury pool earlier this month.

The former president and 18 others were charged last week in Fulton County, Ga., for their actions related to alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election in the state.


The original article contains 326 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 40%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] BioDriver@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago

They need precedent to do anything beyond that. And Trump will give it to them within the next 24 hours.

[-] mookulator@mander.xyz 9 points 3 years ago

Yeah, this time he will actually demonstrate restraint 🙄

[-] dwalin@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago

Lets hope he doesnt

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago

He should be in jail and all they made him do is lower screen time?

[-] ScrollinMyDayAway@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago

It's like taking a phone away from a child as punishment, but the kid throws a screaming tantrum so you give it back to them.

[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago

The only thing funny he ever said on Twitter was the Diet Coke thing, it's all complaints and nonsense other than that.

So, no big loss there.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago

Good move by the court.

[-] havokdj@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago

Loooooool

Uncle Sam basically grounded this motherfucker.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
312 points (98.4% liked)

politics

31317 readers
2669 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS