-6
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

If it needs supervision, why is it still called 'full' self driving?

Ambitious marketing. I think they're still closer to self driving than competing systems, but "full self driving" is definitely a misleading name for what the software can currently do. We are gradually seeing more drives with zero disengagements, so the technology is slowly getting there.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Zero disengagement is exactly what the drivers should be doing in its current state and why it shouldnt be called full self driving.

Ah, I think we are using term "disengagement" slightly differently. A disengagement generally refers to a human driver disengaging FSD as a manual override, not a human driver being disengaged with the task of driving.

[-] Nogami@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Fucking lawyers.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=RAzulqSvJxI

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 0 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=RAzulqSvJxI

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
-6 points (20.0% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !teslamotors@lemmy.zip

1814 readers
1 users here now

This community has moved to:

!teslamotors@lemmy.zip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS