this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
117 points (97.6% liked)

News

23361 readers
3231 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 48 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Why do I feel like they made the right decision? That family needs to be in prison and ALL their billions seized as criminal proceeds. Enough of these bullshit wealth retention escape valves

[–] MiltownClowns@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Isn't it weird to see a good headline come out of the Supreme Court and instead of thinking, "oh, that's nice," you think, "wait a minute, how is this bad?"

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

They've had a couple bangers lately, but the expectations are sooo low

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

They did, however, a new case won’t be brought and heard before the next presidency. Project 2025’s Schedule F hires won’t be prosecuting businesses doing business. Yet another reason to vote in November.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Again $6 billion is nothing, thats $120 million per 1/50 states, how much is even gonna go to each survivor or does the government annex it all basically, add it to the pork barrel to be distributed amongst their "tru$ted" partners/affiliates?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I completely agree that they made the right decision. My point is that the ruling is a double-edged sword if Trump wins in the fall.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In its current form its already nothing, its sets the price tag at $6 billion to addict the nation and start nouveau Opium wars and still get to keep a commi$h and get out of jail free for their service

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

We’ve already spent $52B in settlement funds on local police departments and cash payouts. Without a federal mandate for investment in rehabilitation programs, it’ll just end up spent the same anyway.

https://www.opioidsettlementtracker.com/

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The dissent basically says that a deal was reached to get money from this company and all 50 state’s attorney generals supported this. This decision results in that money possibly being lost and opioid victims never getting paid.

I don’t know enough about it though. Seems like the money part of the bankruptcy should not shield the criminals from going to jail. But it sounds like it might be.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Which is exactly why its not tenable. Why are they negotiating with terrorists? $6 billion is nothing, shave it off the defense budget.

Its way more important that these people are put away and serve as an example, like they do in China. Any small-time drug dealer seling Oxy would have been practically crucified even in the US compared to the Sacklers who were driving the entire addiction campaigns and mess, also the consulting firms. Why is civil forefeiture only a fear for the poors/rest of us. Forfeit now, they can litigate it out later from prison

There's endless fuckery happening and not so much findoutery. That desperately needs to change. I love that scene in Billions when the fraudster investor guy is begging his DA buddy to let him go, and he's like "I'm sorry, I can't. But I know you're gonna go away for a while and come out a new and better man ☺️". These people need way tougher love than that but you get the idea

[–] Condour75@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, said “nothing in present law authorizes the Sackler discharge.”

If you have sackler discharge, that should really be between you and your doctor.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

There's a pill for that.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 4 points 4 months ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackler_family

Not a single one went to prison for this...

How many young men got locked for smocking/selling weed?

Make no mistake that these things, don't just happen!