this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
127 points (99.2% liked)

Games

16630 readers
838 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 40 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I want to see them to get the servers working 100% then have Ubisoft sue them. Then they goto court where Ubisoft will (should) lose their ass and set the precedent on what happens when you pull this shit.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In most jurisdictions this project wouldn't have any problem, when it's a "clean room" implementation - meaning they figured out by themselves how the server works.

Several jurisdictions even allow reverse engineering and such to ensure compatibility / supporting an product that hasn't any official support anymore.

Others simply don't care.

It's all in the details, but they might not get sued that easily.

[–] mycelium_underground@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Not having a good case will not stop a team of highly paid lawyers from moving forward and forcing the mod team to pay for lawyers as the corporate law team pull every string they can to cause delays and try and wait until the mod team runs out of money to pay lawyers.

Even in jurisdictions that have laws to deal with SLAP suits, you have to come up with the cash upfront to fight the case.

Edit: fixed autocorrect mistake

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 35 points 4 months ago

If you shut down game servers in a way that renders the game unplayable you should be legally compelled to release the server source code.

[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

This is one of the best things about PC gaming. I already have played two other "revived" games from my childhood extensivley in the past - NFS World and Battlefield Heroes.

[–] BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

My god maybe that "open source games" lemmy community got one thing right

It's just a joke how e.g. tf2 players beg a megacorp to fix their game every year now. I like tf2 but the power dynamic between the publisher and the player is crazy

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago

I mean, if you want to play a game made by volunteers, that's where Team Fortress came from.

There originally was the Quake-based Team Fortress mod.

There was Weapons Factory for Quake II, which was similar.

The TF team was hired by Valve to do the confusingly-named Team Fortress Classic for Valve's Half-Life, itself based on Quake II.

And Valve did Team Fortress 2.