Wait so now biden can appoint a bunch of judges?
Why would the GOP vote for this?
Am I missing something?
The judges are going to be phased in gradually over the next 12 years. Republicans figure they'll be able to shut down the Democratic party and democracy generally before then, whereas Democratic lawmakers are, with all due respect, fucking idiots who think Lucy will let them kick the football this time.
Makes sense
It's not enough! With the Chevron doctrine being abandoned and the Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy decision (where they basically ended the use of administrative law justices, forcing the use of full jury trials) the caseload of the Federal courts is about to skyrocket.
They're going to need to quadruple (or more) the Federal judiciary if they want it to be able to keep up.
The measure would direct the president to appoint new judges in six increments over the span of 12 years.
You see, this got the unanimous consent because the effects were spread out. This wasn't a Democratic plan to slam dozens of new Liberal judges onto the courts at once, it will happen gradually over the next 3 Presidential terms. Whichever party loses this election will get 2 more shots to stack the Federal judiciary.
Any plans to reform the Supreme Court should be done similarly.
Does this also apply if you want to expand the Senate, the House of Representatives and the Electoral College?
Expanding the House is the only thing that can't be done without an amendment. And if you look at the history of it before the 1910s when they fixed the size of the house at its current value, they increased it by little bits every few years, either after a census or after a new state was admitted
Yet no new asylum judges to help with the backlog of asylum seekers - 99% get deported. If you want to fix the undocumented immigration problem, that is one of the solutions (the other is get rid of the gang pericution asylum type, that is just "I come from a poor country, grant me asylum")
Courthouse News Service Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)
Name: Courthouse News Service Bias: Least Biased
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/courthouse-news-service/
Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News
Internet Archive Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)
Name: Internet Archive Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/internet-archive-bias/
Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News
Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.
Footer
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.