The ‘Hotties for Harris’ Planning a Sexy Party at the DNC (www.thedailybeast.com)

submitted 2 years ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://12ft.io/https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-hotties-for-harris-planning-a-sexy-party-at-the-dnc?ref=home

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 58 points 2 years ago

This is completely disgusting. Where exactly will they be so I can avoid them?

[-] DoctorWhookah@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 years ago

Guess my invitation was lost in the mail.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

[off topic?]

When the Dems held their 1976 convention at Madison Square Garden, the NYPD promised to arrest any unescorted women near the site, because an "unescorted woman" just had to be a hooker. In response, Gloria Steinem and other women said that they'd hang out by the convention. She pointed out that the hookers weren't the only 'unescorted' people and the police weren't arresting every male they saw.

[-] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

The “White Dudes for Harris” groups raised more than $4 million over a Zoom call that featured the likes of “The Dude” Jeff Bridges, *Star Wars *legend Mark Hamill, and Mark Ruffalo gabbing with Pritzker and a pre-VP pick Gov. Tim Walz.

Former President Donald Trump also has some groups trying to target various demographics, including a $20 million “Send the Vote” effort backed by podcast hosts the Nelk Boys and former Trump aide Taylor Budowich.

Mmhmm.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago

On one side is a list of names I recognize, on the other side of a list of names that I don't.

[-] That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I was invited to go, but I'm rather busy with other things.

[-] macattack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Thanks for sharing

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

We need a Kamala boy and the circle will be complete.

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024

92 points (94.2% liked)

politics

30976 readers

1972 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News