this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
463 points (96.2% liked)

Gaming

20057 readers
24 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...and I'm not even done.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Oh look, a boss fight. Will this be a fair-and-balanced skill-based experience? Or will it be a DPS race against the clock and hoping I get good RNG on the enemy attack patterns so I don't die to mostly unavoidable or unreactable damage?

[–] Nefyedardu@kbin.social 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If you want to play the game as a glass cannon DPS machine, you can do that with the right parts. But there's nothing stopping you from actually reading boss patterns and dodging them. The only boss this doesn't apply to is the first one, and I suspect it will get nerfed because of how many people are complaining about it. Some damage is unavoidable but it's minor, every big attack is dodgable and even accompanied by a loud warning sound. I don't think it's unfair.

[–] sparr@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But there’s nothing stopping you from actually reading boss patterns and dodging them.

Is there enough information to do this on the first time through, if you have enough skill? Or is it necessary to try and fail multiple times to see and learn each pattern?

[–] Nefyedardu@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

How would the game give you any more information than it already does without worsening gameplay? Like sure, you can make the boss' moves slower and more telegraphed. Put in Atreus to tell you the Boss' weakness or something while you fight him. I'm personally not a fan of that.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I definitely dislike this dynamic in games. If you're only able to win because you built up muscle memory for that specific segment of the game, it doesn't feel like a real win, feels almost as unrewarding as grinding XP to make things easier.

[–] scubbo@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you don't enjoy practicing bosses, FromSoft games will probably not be for you.

This is not a dunk! There is nothing inherently superior or worthwhile about games that require practice. I personally enjoy Soulslike games, but people who claim they're they're the One True Genre are just fooling themselves.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably, though I did beat and enjoy the first three games in the Dark Souls series (if you include Demon's Souls) before I got tired of it, despite having to iterate on some bosses. There are a few saving graces that make it tolerable: effective options for cheesing, being able to grind XP/gear to make it easier, mandatory downtime between fights that punishes trying to brute force practice them, the option to give up for a while and go explore somewhere else, the presence of more dynamics to fights to optimize than correctly reacting to patterns to the point where you can remain mostly ignorant of them and still win another way. Playing DS3 I got the feeling that maybe the issue was getting worse and I was kind of burned out on the gameplay overall so I dropped it.

I would cite Super Meat Boy as a more pure example of the problem I'm talking about, that game left me feeling brain fried and like I hadn't learned or accomplished anything.

[–] scubbo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

mandatory downtime between fights that punishes trying to brute force practice them

Fascinating. This would frustrate the hell out of me - if I'm trying to get better at something, the last thing I want is enforced wait-time between practice attempts! Still, I'm glad you've found other games that you enjoy more rather than being influenced by the Internet's collective fan-boner for FromSoft.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SolOrion@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Personally I love that! The best bosses are the ones that absolutely demolish me a dozen times while I figure them out.

It makes finally succeeding feel like I've accomplished something.

[–] UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the boss is fairly readable and I can take it down quickly, it's just annoying that it can fly out of bounds where I can't hit it but it can still fire at me. That and your starting mech isn't the best either but I got an S rank on that level after 4-5 attempts.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah the first boss isn't a great first impression. I knew I could beat it in <5 tries but what annoyed me was how boring it was. Basically shoot at the broad side of a barn while hiding behind cover.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I went the other way around. I went all in with my energy sword. Stayed mid air under it as much as possible to use the rockets. When the second blade combo attack hits, it get staggered and you just pummel the boss. Rince and repeat

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my experience, you don't have to compromise. You can take meta dual shotguns and two heavy hitting shoulder mounts and just vaporize enemies. Almost trivially, in fact.

The problem is, the game is not more fun if you force yourself into something like a melee hybrid build. It's significantly harder and there's less room for error when piloting lightweight ACs, so it's no surprise that most people find the most comfortable build to be one where you have high health and damage mitigation, insane burst DPS, and stunlock potential.

In short, there's not a good balance between the different playstyles and difficulty. Some bosses are actually really fun to fight, but two or three of them have made my shit list already just due to the nonsense you are forced to put up with. Juggernaut, Balteus, and Sea Spider are the three biggest offenders right now.

[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had very little trouble with Juggernaut once I started fighting him from the air. He has a very low max firing angle and you can get a nice, clear shot on his butthole from directly above him.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

My gripe with him isn't so much his fight mechanic, it's his absolutely massive hitbox that activates whenever it moves a centimeter.

Fighting him from the air is the most efficient, I've discovered, but I spent a good few attempts trying to get in close with the plasma blade and would see three quarters of my HP bar disappear because my recovery animation overlapped with the startup of his charge attack that shouldn't have been able to hit me because I was to his side or rear.

The Cataphract has been my favorite fight so far. Really challenging, but really rewarding.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago

I've felt this, too. But actually I just hadn't figured out the right response to any given attack.

Manage your EN right, and everything is avoidable.

[–] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I guess we are playing different games if this has been your experience.

[–] Trobador@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I haven't played AC6 yet but the fact that you're bothered by unreactable damage makes me think you're playing this like Souls. But it's not Souls, it's a shooter. Be preemptive? Make your own movement pattern hard to follow.

A very glorified DPS race is more or less what a duel is in a shooter.

[–] Montagge@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Sanguine@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Fromsoft bosses are ALWAYS incredibly fair. They may require practice but you can absolutely learn every boss and master them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a Dark Souls boss, not an Armored Core boss. AC bosses in previous games were usually (with the exception of For Answer) just other ACs with really good AI piloting them, not giant, unique things with mechanics that you don't see anywhere else.

That alone is enough for me to wish they'd called it something else.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, there are actual ACvAC fights, too.

Though I do wish the arena AIs weren't mental three-year-olds. They go down like wet paper.

[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah the arena disappointed the very shit right out of my ass. I just finished it last night and expected the S-rank contenders to be even slightly more difficult than the D-rank ones, but they weren't.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Arena should have been increasingly demanding fights that each require a unique build to conquer. Or even better, each fight should have made you use a pre-set loadout, so you'd have to explore and learn new builds, and that knowledge could then be carried into designing mechs for the campaign missions.

I bet theres a lot of people out there not changing it up at all, missing out on an a lot that the game has to offer.

Ideally each one could have made you adapt to and learn new mechanics.

But it seems each one is just a randomized loadout or a character from the story, with the exact same AI slapped on.

[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The arena is honestly pretty close to how it was in the old games. Hell, in 4A, if you beat White Glint in the story missions before beating her in the arena, you got to skip the arena fight entirely on account of her being dead.

Forcing players to use a specific build goes against the entire spirit of the series, though.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's just an idea I had from a game design perspective.

Nier: Automata is one game with which I saw a lot of people complain, as the game does nearly nothing to get you to actually experiment with different weapon combinations and plug-in chips, and a lot of people overlook those systems because of it. And hence the experience of some players suffered.

Pre-set loadouts in arenas could have been used to address that design problem by showing players the possibilities.

Although, it wouldn't necessarily need to be mandatory. Each arena fight could come with a "recommended AC" for countering the opponent, while still allowing players to take in their own mech should they want to. This could have come with the fights being a lot harder as well, making using your own design viable only if you know what you're doing.

[–] Varyag@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

This is how we know they really nailed it on AC6, this is exactly the experience. Well, whenever I didn't say FUCK IT, and equipped dual Zimmermans and the stun nail launcher.

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sounds like AC3 all over again. Can’t wait to play.

[–] LemmynySnicket@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe it's just the only way I learned to play, but armored core 3 I found only the floating legs were very viable. Then I would equip self aimed missiles and found arena quite simple. The missions you could use different set ups, but I could never win arena much with any other legs.

[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They did away with floaters in this one :(

[–] JGrffn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

New to AC what do you mean by floaters? Are tetra legs not considered floaters?

[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

In 2 and (I think) 3, there was a fifth class of legs called "hover" that basically acted like quads do in hover mode in AC6, but bound to the ground unless you boosted. IIRC, they had the easiest time getting airborne from a boost, but had no unboosted jump. Basically, they were faster treads that could move sideways.

They've been gone since at least 4, though.

[–] Jocarnail@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm loving the experience, but fuck me some bosses are a pain in the ass. I'm stuck on the sea spider, does anyone have suggestions?

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

Don't overuse dodges, a lot of attacks will miss if you're just boost-moving around the boss, so save the dodges for stuff that you actually need it for, so you always have EN to spare.

Don't be afraid to burn your EN on flight when warranted, the spinny thing that the Spider does in its final phase is really easy to avoid if you just fly over it.

Don't stop doing damage, consider having something that you can use to at least poke at the enemy just enough to keep the stun bar from decaying, so you can build it up to get a stagger. Or switch to weapons that have a high impact stat to build stagger faster.

Don't sleep on melee weapons. They do MASSIVE damage if you can land the hit.

[–] Vyllenor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pile driver, 2 songbirds and some other high impact you can carry

Open with charged pile driver, immediately unload all your cannons into it, slap another charged pile driver while it's stunned

After that only go for pile driver when it's stunned

I played with reverse joint, but i reckon quad would be the best, as you can just stay above it, outside its melee range.

If it pounces at you while you're on the ground close to it, dive under it

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago
[–] Glifted@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

New to AC myself. Having a lot of fun with it. I don't get why people are upset about it. Like it isn't the greatest game I've ever played but I'm definitely enjoying it

[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Wow sounded interesting so I checked in steam - the new one needs minimum 12GB ram???!

[–] fiah@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 1 year ago

sir this is 2023

[–] UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

16GB is the new 8GB of 2014. Even so, we're starting to see top triple A games use upwards of 20GB.

[–] CMahaff@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I somehow read this as 128GB and was ready to share your shock.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude you're seriously still stuck with 8GB?

If you're still on DDR3, I have a spare 8GB 1600MHz stick in my old PC. I'll sell it to you for a good price.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not worth the shipping!

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

It's a stick of RAM. Wrap it in bubble wrap, shove it in an envelope, stick a couple of stamps on it, and send it on its way.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not unusual. Or do you mean vram? Still not surprising with the detail level in the game.

[–] TotallyTerry@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Definitely doesn't need 12gb of vram so they mean ram which 16gb should be the minimum for anyone's system nowadays.

load more comments
view more: next ›