this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
528 points (98.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35551 readers
166 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There is no reason to require this setting for users who aren’t posting live videos.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 210 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Hostage permissions

This is why I really like grapheneos. They've created scoped permissions, so the operating system tells the application Yes you can see this thing, but it's empty. Right now they've implemented scoped storage, and scoped contacts. So if it tries to extort you to see your entire contact list you can limit it to an empty list, a very limited list, or everything if you don't care

https://grapheneos.org/features#storage-scopes

[–] Cris16228@lemmy.today 45 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

Sadly Is pixel only... right?

Yup

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Yea, but it's a good phone to target, Pixels are one of the few remaining manufacturers that freely let you unlock the BL and probably one of the last that is carried by nearly all major US carriers. OnePlus used to be another but iirc they've stopped selling on all carriers stores

Yes yes yes, you can buy any frequency-compatible phone you'd like from like Amazon, AliExpress, Best Buy, manufacturer store etc but that's an expensive option for many as you have to front the entire purchase price with little exception.

So if you want a BL unlockable phone, purchased through a carrier to take advantage of the reduced financial load of payments instead of all up front, in the US...it's pretty much just Pixels

[–] Cris16228@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I was interested because everyone keeps talking about it and I wanted to try it myself but it's compatible only with pixels. I have a Samsung and I changed phone recently so I'm not going to buy it again. I don't want to spend 600+ for a new phone + 2/300? (100?) for the buds but my next phone will be a pixel🤔

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Oof, yea Samshits are the worst of the worst. They're actively hostile to those who would dare want to use their phone how they see fit.

Even if the stars align and people are able to breakthrough the BL lockdown, Samshit phones are designed to blow an efuse and permanently lock the phone to 80% battery capacity just for a big ol fuck you

Never EVER buy Samshit phones if you can help it

[–] Cris16228@lemmy.today 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Uh what? For real? And that's shit is even legal?! TIL! I'll never buy another Samsung phone then

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Take it with a grain of salt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] puppy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Why would you want to buy new buds?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 3 months ago

Thank you for not saying that the bootloader comes unlocked. It doesnt.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You can't unlock the bootloader on carrier-locked Pixel phones; they need to be SIM unlocked in order for the "OEM Unlocking" option to be available.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Yes, but it's far easier to obtain a SIM unlock than it is to unlock a BL from a manufacturer that just says "No" instead of "As long as it gets carrier unlocked"

I have a Pixel Fold purchased and (still) financed through T-Mobile that is BL unlocked and rooted. Most of the time they'll override their SIM unlock requirements if you've had an account for awhile. Unsure about ATT, I've heard they're 50/50. Verizon, ofc, are a bunch of bitches about it

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's only guaranteed to work with pixels. It still works with other phones, but with varying degrees of success and obviously no official support.

[–] Cris16228@lemmy.today 10 points 3 months ago

Oh... If there's no official support and problems, I'm not going to install it

[–] olof@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'm using it on a Fairphone 5 since a while. Works flawless

[–] Cris16228@lemmy.today 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

But which version? Plus, I've learned todsy that Samshit locks the battery at 80% with unlocked BL... Even if I'm using it on my dev phone, 20% is A LOT

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] odium@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately not in NA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Cris16228@lemmy.today 5 points 3 months ago

Oh! I meant grapheneOS, It looked interesting and I wanted to install it on my phone

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I heard of scoped permissions before but didn't know it could also zero the outputs of sensors to trick intrusive apps. That's a neat feature set.

[–] PopShark@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I really hope Apple implements scoped permissions sometime soon

Edit: lol I just realized the OP could press “Not Now” - though technically the app would then prevent posting stories still :/

[–] die444die@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

This already exists in iOS with photos, and contacts are in iOS 18

[–] RangerJosie@sffa.community 61 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I installed it earlier this year on android. But it wouldn't let me sign in or browse without syncing my contacts from my phone.

So I uninstalled it.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 35 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That is the healthy choice

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

There is a metric somewhere that shows installation and then instant uninstall. I hope it brings sadness to soulless hearts.

[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 months ago

Yup, that's the correct reaction.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Consider pixelfed, the fediverse alternative to Instagram

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I really like pixelfed, but it replaces what instagram was a decade ago, not what instagram is now.

Pixelfed is amazing for sharing photography type photos.

Instagram is now a photo sharing, video sharing, tiktok doomscrolling, messaging service, noticeboard in one.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I used to love Instagram 5-10 years ago. I despise today’s Instagram.

I left it about two years ago. The tiktok style short videos are way too fucking addictive and bring near zero value to my day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Instagram no longer allowed to be installed on my phone, how is that for a deal, Meta?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I set up Amazon Echo buds recently. I have no desire to use any of the Alexa crap on them and just wanted cheap, decent noise cancelling Bluetooth earbuds on prime day. You apparently can't set them up without the Alexa app and like all the permissions. I downloaded it on an old phone that's practically blank, set up the buds, and deleted the app. Once it's set up you can use like regular Bluetooth earbuds. They wanted location all the time and a few others (microphone maybe?). Selecting only allow this time wouldn't even work. I get it Bezos, u want my data, but fuck off u aren't getting it.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

You should look if it works with gadgetbridge. Maybe you can get some functionality back that the app had?

[–] occultist8128@infosec.pub 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

all meta's apps are suck ngl. i hate the way i can't paste image from clipboard in whatsapp chat without giving whatsapp permission to manage my storage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Gonna play Devil's Advocate for a moment here.

I assume that this isn't actually for nefarious purposes, and is actually just a low-effort way of curbing spambots on their platform. It's likely that the bots are using emulated devices to post from the official app, and this permission might lock up a lot of those bots. Obviously this wouldn't be the best way to combat spambots, but I'm gonna go with Hanlon's Razor on this one.

I know the immediate first thought most people will have is that this is just so Meta can open up another avenue to spy on you. But let's consider for a moment the logistics involved in that. Audio/video data is huge; capturing and parsing it it requires a non-insignificant amount of CPU/battery usage, and transmitting it will use a good bit of bandwidth, both of which would be noticeable by even novice users (since most modern devices these days will show an on-screen indicator whenever certain sensors are being activated, and will tell you what app is using it, so seeing Instagram trigger your mic/camera when you're not using it would be immediately noticed by just about everybody). That would also make this one data stream exponentially more costly to gather and process for Meta than most of their other data streams combined.

Also consider the fact that Meta already has over a million data points on just about every single person on the planet, anyway; what could they stand to gain by monitoring your IRL presence that they haven't already inferred from the other, less-invasive data they've gathered on you? Half of the recordings they'd get would be farts and "oh my god, stop barking, nobody's even at the door", and Meta probably already knows that you have a dog and lactose intolerance.

It's more expensive to produce, it's more likely to be detected, and there's less of a guarantee that you even get any usable data from it at all since they already know just about everything about you already. I really don't see spying as the end goal for this particular action, only because it doesn't seem like a profitable venture.

None of this is to suggest that Meta isn't spying on you. They are. They 100% are spying on each and every one of you. I just don't think the mic/camera are how they're doing it.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 months ago

Not even that, it's more than likely some PM said "we want to open the camera and be ready to record when someone goes on the story tab", then it gets implemented as needing permissions first and not considering that some people wouldn't want to give the permissions and only upload from camera roll

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

It's a new frontier in sourcing material for AI training...

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If they don’t already have rules about this, Google and Apple should update their store rules to prevent this crap.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Robotunicorn@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Not surprised. It’s just Meta being Meta and garbling up all yo data so that it can make money from it. Maybe don’t use the app. Try accessing from your mobile browser.

[–] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They keep filtering the stupid people, but there's always more.

I keep wondering what zuck has to do to be more obvious, but it seems like an infinite horizon to someone whe never signed up for any meta product.

Also, soft switches don't really turn things off. Physical covers over cameras, mics, and speakers can't be overridden.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I believe that there's some app out there for Android that lets one create a spoofed environment for apps that demand certain permissions to function. Returns bogus data to them. Might require a rooted device, though.

goes looking

Yeah.

I think I'm thinking of XPrivacyLua, which requires Xposed, which in turn requires a rooted device.

EDIT: all that being said, I do think that if practicable, it is kind of an argument to use something other than Instagram, and more broadly, to try to keep use on a personal computer rather than phone, where it's easier to deal with or avoid shennanigans like this.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago

Technically Graphene OS can do this

[–] Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I only use Instagram to look at the reels my family sends me, I don't allow myself to use it for anything else because you can easily waste 2 hours and feel miserable afterwards. What I like about Lemmy is I can get through all new posts for the day in at most 20 mins and maybe learn about some interesting while I'm at it.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah I use it to keep up with friends/family and have a private account— most people I know don’t post regular posts, only stories, so it’s actually quite easy for me to exhaust all the content I care about and then leave. The post feed is mostly ads for me since my friends don’t post. The ‘explore’ feed for me is mostly indian weddings and flood content for some unfathomable reason.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago

gee, guess i'll just have to continue never using it, then...

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if saving the website as an app would work around this restriction?

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 months ago

This does appear to be a functional workaround atm (the mobile website via safari app allows me to post photos to stories) but the editor is severely gimped so you can’t resize images and such. Desktop version doesn’t seem to allow you to post stories at all. If I NEED to share something perhaps I’ll use this.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

iOS plus Facebook

The "dream" combo

load more comments
view more: next ›