404
I literally laughed hysterically at this. Actually scared myself with the noises I made.
Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung had said: "The fact is that a private photographer was permitted on the premises and for whatever reason an unnamed individual, clearly suffering from a mental health episode, decided to physically block members of President Trump's team during a very solemn ceremony."
Project 2025 is trying to drag the US back to a time where any woman who dares to question a man, or expresses an opinion not given to her by her father or husband, or speaks out of turn, is immediately labeled as, "hysterical".
Oh this makes so much more sense now. The army soldier was a woman.
That explains the whole "mental health episode" excuse.
Also reverse victim and offender, DARVO.
The very solemn ceremony that they turned into a campaign video.
He really is quite weird saying that someone who tried to enforce the rules they're employed to enforce was ”clearly suffering from a mental health episode”
Did I say ”weird?” I meant ”a complete cunt”
Bruh have you heard about that guy before?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Cheung_(political_advisor)
He's fucking nuts, and as soon as I heard trump staff got in a fight at a cemetery and accused workers of having a mental illness, I knew it was Cheung.
Calling him a "complete cunt" is really underselling it. He acts like Elong Musk, just responds to anything with outrageous insults and loud noises.
I can’t believe he’s 42. The photo there from 2018 makes him look 60.
Terrible to himself, terrible to others. Terrible human being.
Things you say to protect a rapist.
For those keeping track, Trumpers have now picked fights with:
-the US Army
-Bud Light
-the NFL
-Taylor Swift
You dropped these:
- women
- LGBTQ+
- persons of color
- the rest of the military
- Capitol police
- atheists
- the childless
- education
- people who like cats
- literally not being mean to people
- school lunches for poor children
- Gillette
- nonviolence
- democracy
- the rule of law
The fact that they even have double digit vote share is a sign that actual merit is low on the list of criteria in politics.
Don't forget (covered by "the rest of the military") but still needs to be called out:
- P.O.W.s
- Medal of Honor recipients
- Gold Star families
I know it's weird that I'm hung up on that one, but:
Context/Source for "literally not being mean to people"
I know, I know "democracy" should be more than enough (and it is) but I still want to know
“Woke” is basically “not being a raging dick to people”. They can’t ever define it because basically any real definition of the term makes them look incredibly bad.
oh yeah, makes sense.
I've had my bad experiences in the past with people you'd typically call "woke", namely I've had a person tell me that I couldn't use the german word "Digga" because it sounded too close to "nigga". (I am not making this up.)
But I am very well aware that this isn't what the MAGA crowd means when they call someone "woke" and that there are militants in every group (looking at you, c/vegan). So yeah, your explanation makes sense. Thanks for explaining :)
There’s obviously such a thing as taking it too far, but yeah “anything I don’t like is woke” is more their play.
You forgot the ex Australian prime Minister too
And most of Europe. Look, it’s not a comprehensive list, okay?
In just this last 24 hour news cycle, you can add wind (which causes people not to eat bacon) and sleeping on the beach while on vacation (Biden). Trump is a deeply weird dude.
The guy could graffiti the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier and say he had permission from a family, and his people would say it was totally okay.
The biggest travesty here is that the employee won't press charges because he's afraid of retaliation. Either by Trump himself, his mom of rabid cultists, or both.
Least the bar Is not so low he has to pay for protection.
She, and they'll probably still go after her anyway. Hopefully she can still press charges if that happens.
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
404 points (98.8% liked)
politics
31317 readers
2304 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS