this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
77 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

59594 readers
2893 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

In the 60s they had pressurize tubes running to your table with the food. But the person putting it into the tube had to know what table your were sitting at. 70s came around and the process of just yelling out the person's name to come up and get it was found to be more efficient. Don't see how this could be more cost efficient than that - unless it is at a fancy restaurant. Then there are other jobs that the waiter does beside transporting food.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And the problem with replacing menial jobs is...? Just eliminate all the useless / shitty jobs and move us over to UBI already.

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that the wealth generated by the robots is going to the owners, not to the workers that lose their jobs, as always. Otherwise it'd be great.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are people getting wealthy from working as waiters?

[–] style99@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Would you rather see them begging in the streets?

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd rather see them doing something they enjoy for a fair wage while being treated like a human being. Universal Basic Income had already been mentioned in this thread, why is begging on the streets the only other option?

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Because UBI doesn't exist in this area and the robots are already there.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Robots incur more costs when you realise you can always just hire a waiter and not deal with robot maintenance and purchasing costs

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago

It will all boil down to what kind of maintenance is required. A robot for $50k would pay for itself in saved wages in under a year, even less if it collected tips. A lot of smaller diners (Waffle/Huddle/Waddle/etc) typically have super low staffing requirements (line cook + 1 or 2 servers per shift, occasionally more) and could totally use robots due to the simple layout and standardization of the restaurants.

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

These things need less maintenance as a Roomba, in CA since wages are so high, fucking Denny's has a robot waiter

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What it means... well, just check Japan. Restaurants where the chefs would be replaced if they could make it automated.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

That would be great.

Hopefully one day soon.

[–] Wrongdoer4094@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

As a tech enthusiast and software developer I think this is amazing! I would love to have them in my hometown in Spain :)

[–] atthecoast@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago

Korea will have to come up with solutions as the birth rate has been low for a long time

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

AP News is basically the only media source I really trust. Their reporting is always factual and with as little bias/editorializing as possible.