this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
381 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

58535 readers
4453 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 77 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Non-ionizing radiation once again tested and once again shown to not corelate to cancer.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well, obviously, you just have to put a sticker with a geometric pattern on it to turn the bad radiation into good radiation!

(I wish that was a joke, but you can actually buy those)

[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I worked for a guy that made and sold them. Still does actually. Cool guy, but I think he started to believe his own bullshit.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

They always break rule 1: never get high on your own supplies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 65 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Great so maybe now the conspiracy morons will shutup about this.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

surely, since they're always up and up about scientific research and very receptive to it

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If evidence would change their minds it already would have

[–] aleph@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

To be fair, the evidence about a link between cell phone radiation and cancer has been inconclusive for quite some time. After all, a series of inconclusive or null results doesn't mean there is categorically no link -- it could equally mean that more research is needed.

That said, I do agree that if there were a casual link in this case then it would have made itself apparent by now, given the huge increase in cell phone usage over the past few decades.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago (6 children)

A series of null results is all we have regarding the hypothesis that winged monkeys can fly out of my arse as well, or the hypothesis that the pyramids were built by those same winged monkeys in exchange for pastrami sandwiches from Canters. Beyond a certain point, absence of evidence can be construed as evidence of absence, particularly when the test is specifically meant to detect a particular phenomenon.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 17 points 1 month ago

Seems like most of them moved on to vaccines, election tampering, and flat earth. Other than the odd blurb about 5G (ignoring older generations and WiFi), I barely hear at all about cell phones causing cancer anymore. Used to be all over Reddit.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dream on, mate.

I've known people with basic scientific educations who still refuse to accept the fact that a few milliwatts of RF energy cannot ionize anything, let alone tweak your somatic DNA. If that did happen, broadcast radio and TV would be thousands of times more deadly, and I could make a death ray out of my home wifi box and a wok.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

and I could make a death ray out of my home wifi box and a wok.

I mean, you could. Do you happen to have a small nuclear reactor and about 400l of liquid helium?

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

this is not how conspiracy theories work. these start and end with need for feeling special for "having" some secret knowledge. it's all elaborated nicely if you have an hour of unnecessary time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTfhYyTuT44

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Special knowledge that comes from media that millions of people are exposed to, in a form that any anonymous asshole can easily fabricate. Really fucking esoteric.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

No, they'll likely just attack the authors as being "in on it"

[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You forgot to add the /s in the end...

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Knowing how their mind works, they’ll read some misleading headline, and then make it their “research” once again

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Well, the signals aren't. But all those Nokias and Motorolas and Blackberries breaking down in landfills and turning into microplastics that infest our bodies... The jury is still out on that one.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Most of the microplastics in human bodies come from the wearing down of car and truck tires.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 6 points 1 month ago

Also brake dust is carcinogenic ❤️❤️❤️

[–] banghida@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago
[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think microplatics are whats gonna kill us (well besides climate change).

It's just gonna keep building up in our systems and the environment until critacal mass.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It's going to kill poor folks. Rich people will have the better filter installations to keep micro plastics out.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Brain cancer, no. Brain rot, yes.

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

You can have the next quip.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I thought this was already very well known

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Never hurts to have more and more evidence for something.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At some point we are wasting time and money just to keep shutting up the morons.

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Yes, but no at the same time.

New testing methods, new 'ingredients' to test interactions with and so on require reconfirmation of 'known' science.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

We've known earth isn't flat for awhile too but sometimes people apparently need reminders. Could use a new study on the failures of fascism as a government structure, but looks like we might need to learn the hard way again on that one.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can you imagine if cellphones were linked to cancer and radiation, etc? Even if it was proven I don't think humans would be able to give them up at this point

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

We’re still trying to get people to quit smoking.

If phones killed you, we’d all just have to die

[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

I paid a visit to Green Bank WV once out of an interest in astronomy. The giant radio telescopes are truly a sight to behold!

Less impressive were the people camped out nearby who saw the place as the promised land where they could cast off their tinfoil hats in the cellular-banned zone surrounding the complex.

[–] Veddit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I thought the headline said they were linked. My first reaction (which surprised me) was "oh well, not much to be done about that then eh". Glad I re-read it 😅

[–] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›