this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
127 points (99.2% liked)

News

38809 readers
1809 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Regions where people most often reach 100-110 years old are the ones where there’s the most pressure to commit pension fraud, and they also have the worst records. For example, the best place to reach 105 in England is Tower Hamlets. It has more 105-year-olds than all of the rich places in England put together. It’s closely followed by downtown Manchester, Liverpool and Hull. Yet these places have the lowest frequency of 90-year-olds and are rated by the UK as the worst places to be an old person.

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mighty@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The secret to living to 110 was, don’t register your death.

yeah lol

short version: almost all "very old humans" are just dead and never register their deaths

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How inconsiderate to just die and not call someone about it..

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

It's more common that dependents who are receiving the benefits don't register the death to keep the payments flowing. I personally think a lot of places could be much more generous with poverty assistance instead of forcing those folks to keep the pensions flowing to garner aide.

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Wow, I never would have considered that this stuff would distort the stats so massively. But it actually makes a lot of sense and he seems to have some very damning data points. Very interesting.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I used to work for a big north American restaurant chain. Any employer provided employment development was schlocky pop self help. They were always full of studies like longevity studies proving their efficacy. Self help is closer to evangelical big church religion than help. Such a scam. Those classes were so painful.

Anyways glad to see something so commonly held put up to scrutiny.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I have a physicist cousin who has a knighthood and an Ig Nobel prize.

He's far more proud of the latter.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would think that I reached the peak of my career if I won an Ig Nobel prize.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I mean I'm sure he hopes for a real Nobel one day, but I'm sure he took this as a wonderful consolation prize.

I think he found the knighthood thing embarrassing mostly. He said he started to explain why he got it to the queen and she couldn't have been more disinterested.

He was part of a panel this weekend at the MIT Museum. It was interesting to hear how widespread this problem of poor record keeping is for births and deaths. Up until quite recently (like the 1960's for the US), many places were, and some still are, terrible about it. That didn't even include things like China's former one child policy.

It's not just a curiosity that some people don't actually know how old they really are. It has real effects. When you're trying to make health care or retirement benefit decisions for a whole country, having bad population data is a serious concern. Life insurance actuaries probably treat out their hair over this sort of issue, too